Don’t Look Now

Warning: this review contains spoilers

Cinema, perhaps better than any other medium, has the ability to completely collapse time through the power of editing. Think the epic transition between the prehistoric era and space travel in 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968), the non-linear structures of Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino, 1994), allowing viewers to experience cinema in terms of thematic connection and not simply A-to-B storytelling. Don’t Look Now is another classic example of how editing can transform material into something truly haunting and marvellous. Yet here, instead of freeing the story, Don’t Look Now’s editing chokes it, creating a sense of dread that is palpable from the very first frame to the last.

Nicolas Roeg had experimented with fragmented storytelling techniques before with editor Antony Gibbs with Performance (1970) and Walkabout (1971), yet this collaboration with Graeme Clifford represented a major step up in form; its use of fast-forwards, flashbacks and frequent, sometimes lightning-quick insert shots a true masterclass in form.

Everything is set from the very first frame, entombed in stone like Venice’s churches. While John (Donald Sutherland) and Laura Baxter’s (Julie Christie) daughter — clad in an iconic red mackintosh — is playing with a red ball outside a pond, John is working through some slides. As he spills water on the slide of a church, the scene turns completely red, linking his daughter’s drowning with his own eventual bloody demise.

They move to Venice, where John works on restoring a church. The city is treated as one giant mausoleum, emptied out and shrouded in mist. It’s wintertime, everyone is wrapped up in hats, scarves and coats, and there are endless shadows emanating from its tiny, winding alleyways. As the psychic blind woman says, expressing her sister’s view: “it’s like a city in aspic, wrapped over from a dinner party, where all the guests are dead or gone.” It’s a place, like John and Laura, stuck in time, seemingly unable to move forwards or backwards.

Their relationship suffers, as demonstrated by its now iconic sex scene. It is still rare to see a film use sex as a thematic point rather than simply plot advancement, Laura and John desperately writhing together as a means to cling on to the little spark of life they have left. Intercut with scenes of them getting dressed afterwards, it stresses both their togetherness and estrangement, showing the difficulty of maintaining passion after suffering such a momentous loss. Grief has this power to rent people apart, giving them little to cling onto other than the memory of their daughter.

When Laura meets fellow British tourists Heather (Hilary Mason) and Wendy (Clelia Matania) and Heather explains how she can communicate with her daughter, she is naturally intrigued by these odd yet mystical duo. In a common horror theme from Rosemary’s Baby (Roman Polasnki, 1968) to Hereditary (Ari Aster, 2018), her husband doesn’t believe a word she says. But when he starts seeing a little hooded figure in a red mackintosh who looks just like his daughter, mysterious happenings start to question his grounded and skeptical beliefs. Perhaps he has the ability to see things too.

The technicolour cinematography allows the red of his daughter’s jacket to really pop out, contrasting violently with all the other muted colours. It is perhaps one of the most famous uses of the colour in cinematic history, alongside the little girl in a red coat in the otherwise black-and-white Schindler’s List (Steven Spielberg, 1993). To stress the murderous aspect of the colour, Roeg often uses dissolves, allowing red objects to bleed into one another with nightmarish regularity.

Things double and double, the use of repetition and doppelgängers constricting the narrative to its deadly eventuality. John’s hubris is in thinking he can make sense of what he sees in front of him. With bodies fished out of the river at regular intervals, and a sighting of his wife on a boat with the two women, John frantically searches for his wife despite the fact she has gone back to England to see her son, who has had a mysterious accident. What he has in fact seen is a premonition of his own funeral. The ending — which is either haunting or oddly bathetic depending on who you ask — then reveals that the red cloaked figure is not a phantom but a murderous dwarf, who quickly dispatches him with a knife. Then in a remarkably edited sequence, the whole film seems to pass before his eyes, revealing its narrative to be almost completely circuitous.

There is a religious component to the dazzling editing. If God exists, then He would not see the world in a linear fashion, but everything that has ever happened and everything that will ever happen simultaneously. Everything is predetermined, nothing happens by chance. This is the true horror: not jump scares or bloody mutilations, but the idea that nothing you can do can ever change your fate. Only the gifted such as Heather and John can see parts of the future, but this doesn’t mean they can do anything about it. A truly terrifying prospect indeed.

A 4k restoration of Don’t Look Now hits UK cinemas on Friday, July 5th (nearly half a century after its original release in 1973)

Nina Wu

Nina is young and pretty. she has left rural Taiwan and moved to glitzy Taipei in search of a promising opportunity as a film star. She’s advised, however, that the role includes full frontal nudity in bed with two men. She’s told: “if that makes you uncomfortable don’t even audition for the it”. She auditions and wins. But that’s just the start of her problems. The menacing filmmaker manipulates her constantly. He emotionally harasses her in order to elicit the strongest emotions. At times, it’s unclear whether Nina’s acting or genuinely frightened.

What starts out as a didactic #MeToo statement about abuse in the film industry gradually develops into something far more complex and sinister. Some of the sequences within the film being made border absurdity. Nina is on a dinghy full of boxes. The police arrives and orders the shooting to stop. The boxes explode and a bloodied Nina jumps into the water. She nearly dies. The credits roll. Maybe this is a film within a film within a film. There’s a also dream within a dream within a dream. The layers of reality, allegory and imagination blend seamlessly.

Ke-xi is spectacular. She has the power to convey the most varies emotions with her facial expressions. She will make you laugh and cry. And she can navigate comfortably through the film’s various narratives layers, confounding viewers about her real emotions.

The story zigzags back and forth in time, and in the second half of the movie we learn the details of the extremely bizarre audition. The producer pits women against each other, turning the aspiring film stars into vile bitches (literally). The invidious female who ended second seeks to exact revenge on Nina. We also learn that Nina is a Lesbian in a relationship with a woman in her hometown back in the countryside. This is a very significant point, as Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalise gay marriage just a few days ago. Nina, however, prioritises her career ahead of the romance. Perhaps because she thinks that the country isn’t prepared to accept a Lesbian actress just yet.

The film is dotted with strange imagery, bordering the surreal. A gecko moves inside a lamp. Nina is tortured on a stretcher inside a beauty clinic. She runs outside covered in plastic wrap and strangers snap her with their phone. Plus the audition and filming are extremely bizarre. And funny. Nina Wu balances out tension and humour extremely well.

Stick around until the very end of this 103-minute film. A lot comes full circle in the last sequence. This isn’t just a psychological thriller dotted with the bizarre gimmicks and narrative tricks. It has something very serious to say.

Nina Wu showed in the 72th Cannes International Film Festival, as part of the Un Certain Regard section (2019), when this piece was originally written. This isn’t the only film in the event dealing with a male director humiliating and manipulating the film actresses. Gaspar Noe does it too, if from a very different and far more disturbing perspective.

The film premieres in the UK in October in the London East Asia Film Festival (LEAFF). On Mubi on Tuesday, July 13th (2021)

Final Ascent: The Legend of Hamish McInnes

Hamish MacInnes reflects, while remembering the details of an incredible life: I find it very difficult to remember the beginning because I was so ill”. Once a magnificent Himalayan mountaineer, the years and an episode of delirium have taken away many of his memories. “There comes a time when everyone seems destined to end up on the scrapheap”, 84-year-old MacInnes potently says.”Decisions were made and that’s where I ended up. But I’m not dead yet.”

There’s a beautiful tapestry of stills, clips and photographs detailing the varying climbs MacInnes braved through the avalanches he himself confesses he has lost count on. Chief among his social circles is Monty Python thespian,turned travel documentarian, Michael Palin. Palin describes his subject as gifted with an aura that made you feel secure, fearlessly climbing even in the most arduous of conditions. Death hangs in every frame. As a younger man, Macinnes told an interviewee the necessity of warm clothing to survive the snow rimmed mountains. As an elderly man, the Scottish born adventurer discusses a different alternative to death.

MacInnes was hospitalised after an accident outside of his own home, taken to Belford Hospital, Fort William, and bedded as a dementia patient. One of his escape attempts was seen as an act of suicide, as the hospital staff found him on a roof, when all he craved was a sense of freedom. That an expert of the open air and hills should be so cruelly confined is unnerving, yet the film offers many impossibly charming moments. Searching through his tool kits, MacInnes discusses some old ice axes, the early pioneers of future equipment. The warmth and importance one man can hold towards a piece of metal is devastatingly well crafted. MacInnes displayed a precocious talent for innovation even as a teenager. At 17, he designed his own motor!

The film’s director Robbie Fraser has described this film as one of memory more than mountain, and through the portmanteau of photos levied, he’s not wrong. And yet it’s a mountainous terrain for the lead interviewee, hauling himself through the angles he left behind by personally facing the peaks and icy components of his life. It’s a walk as terrifying as any he has done, a fight with his own self. But there is a wonderful sense of achievement hanging in the air, the film closing with the jaunty tune These Are My Mountains carrying through the closing credits. A triumph of human spirit!

Final Ascent: the Legend of Hamish McInnes is out in cinemas across the UK on Friday, May 10th.

Destination Wedding

Lindsay (Winona Ryder) and Frank (Keanu Reeves) are both on their way to a wedding in San Luis Obispo in California’s wine country. Lindsay was the groom’s ex and Frank is the groom’s brother. They haven’t met each other before but do so in the departure lounge of the flight to San Luis Obispo where they immediately start up a pointless argument about where Frank is standing. They can’t stand each other, they can’t stand the wedding couple, they can’t stand the idea of going to the wedding, they are both full-time haters of humanity. They don’t even like themselves. Frank has the disgusting habit of itching his ear while making a sort of howling sound. Lindsay breathes on plants. Welcome to the world of wacky Californians.

The film continues in this vein with both of them continually contradicting each other in what is supposed to be a witty way. They don’t sit with the other guests on the evening before the wedding before they despise them. They don’t appreciate their wedding free gifts left in their hotel rooms or their transport (all of it complimentary – this is the world of rich Californians). They get bored at the wedding, wander off into the surrounding countryside and encounter a wild lynx (I presume that was the cat in question). Frank frightens it off with the disgusting howling sound he makes when he itches his ear. They both fall over into each other’s arms and before you can blink, they are making love.

I have never seen or heard of a couple of any description of sexuality make love, including their orgasm sounds, while carrying on what is supposed to be a witty conversation. Sexy? No, not at all. If you get your jollies imagining or looking at celebrities making love, this is not how to go about it. Believe it or not, they eventually fall in love and secure their affection by drinking wine and eating what looks like a large bar of Toblerone on one of their hotel beds. Of course, they go on arguing but that is supposed to be part of the fun.

This movie is essentially a celebrity vehicle. Lots of people will like it because they like celebrities or are crazy about Winona Ryder or Keanu Reeves. Hollywood films about sparring couples are not new and are sometimes quite funny. I was left cold. I find it an exercise in social sycophancy of a particularly American kind. I am reminded of British people watching films about the Royal Family in a grovelling way – not that such films show royal couples making love, but you never know, Megan and Harry might surprise us yet. Harry at least knows how to get his kit off in Las Vegas!

Celebration Wedding is out in cinemas across the UK on Friday, May 10th.

My Days of Mercy

Mercy (Kate Mara) is a woman unwilling to offer her own mercy to the criminal who killed her father’s police partner. Across from her, Lucy (Ellen Page) fights for the innocence of her incarcerated father, convinced that he did not end her mother’s life. They meet in a line of picketing protests, where flirtations quickly make way for more romantic endeavours.

This is a profoundly romantic movie also dealing with the impact of grief on our daily lives. Fittingly for a subject on death, it concerns itself on the living and how people live in the face of their mortality. The interchanging lines on the death penalty is strangely hushed at points, Tim Robbins’s Dead Man Walking (1995) dealt with the subject more abjectly and thoroughly.

The outstanding leads present us with tender exchanges, intense moments and movements. The ever youthful Page presents herself as a stilted 22-year-old, fearful of the life she will lead without either parent to guide her, while Mara offers a career-best performance, and nuances she’s rarely shown in past projects where her remarkable good looks have been the focal point. Political and societal factors cleverly update the tensions felt by two families in an age where gay marriage is a common milestone.

Mercy is free-spirited, headstrong and highly strung, a presence Lucy limns in her daily life, where her family frets over the innocence their father exhibits. Through the escapism of love, Lucy and Mercy find in each other a partnership that exists beyond the polemic. Shalom Ezer depicts sex with decorous flair, coitus with ornamental detail, demonstrating the instinctive, natural and constant chemistry the two women share. Co-producers and real life friends, Mara and Page sizzle with that zest and excitement a mutual attraction solicits.

While the script is a bit unimaginative at points, the jokes a little lame (Lucy, while meeting with her pro-bono lawyer, makes a very tiringly obvious “pro-boning” remark), and the politics regarding the death penalty frustratingly vague (the film refuses to give an opinion over a punishment which has fervent advocates on both sides), My Days Of Mercy is still delightfully romantic, gorgeous in the chemistry between the two unlikely lovers.

My Days of Mercy is out in UK cinemas and also on digital HD on Friday, May 17th. On VoD on Monday, August 5th.

Birds of Passage (Pájaros de Verano)

This family saga begins in Northern Colombia in the late 1960s, before the country became a prominent marijuana exporter. The Wayúu people are mostly untouched by modern civilisation. They speak their own language and engage in their indigenous traditions. Rapayet (José Acosta) courts his partner Zaida (Natalia Reyes) during an exuberant dancing ritual (one of the film’s most beautiful sequences). He’s then asked to pay a hefty dowry: 50 goats, 20 cows and a number of stone necklaces.

Rapayet finds a brand new approach to money-raising. That’s when the ancient culture begins to desintegrate. He sells marijuana to a young American hippie, who’s also campaigning against communism. Perhaps unwittingly, Rapayet wholeheartedly embraces the capitalistic ideal. He eventually learns Spanish and becomes a powerful drug lord, to the tribe’s matriarch’s dismay (a formidable woman called Ursula, played by Carmiña Martínez). The Wayúu traditions are quickly blended with drugs, heavy weaponry, vehicles and extensive violence. Rapayet becomes extremely rich and builds an impressive mansion in the middle of the desert fields. The building is a strange monument to wealth and tradition.

People are divided into three categories: the indigenous Wayúu, the alijunas (non-indigenous Spanish-speaking Colombians) and the gringos. Rapayet attempt to cling to his people’s traditions, but his alijuna associate Moises (Jhon Narváez) gradually defiles his native purity. Rapayet learns to kill, to negotiate with alijunas and gringos alike. Testosterone-fuelled greed spirals out of control and the threat of war between two Wayúu clans becomes a palpable danger. Very much à la Italian mafia (Scorsese’s 1972 The Godfather will probably spring to mind). The consequences of such war could be devastating. Rapayet wishes to prevent such armed conflict, but is the damage irreversible, is it now too late?

The director and crew behind the Oscar-nominated Embrace of the Serpent (Ciro Guerra, 2015) have created yet another cinematographically accomplished movie. The imagery is nothing short of breathtaking. The arid landscape provides a soothing backdrop to the fascinating indigenous rituals and also to the violent action. One of the final sequences has Tarkovsky’s The Sacrifice (1986) written all over it (I can’t tell you more without spoiling the ending for you). The film ends in the early 1980s

In a way, Birds of Passage is also a film about Colombia. About the country’s sudden obsession with drug trade. The Colombian economy boomed in the 1960s and 1970s after agriculture and farming were quickly replaced by marijuana plantations. But this wealth came at a price. Ancient traditions were polluted and perverted. Birds of Passage represents the twisted coming-of-age of a South American nation. Like a dysfunctional teenager who deep-dives into adulthood intoxicated with drugs.

Birds of Passage, however, does have a few problems. At 125 minutes, it does overstay its welcome. At times, the story becomes lethargic and laborious. Some of the acting is a little contrived. The film’s visual excellence is not on a par with the vaguely clunky storytelling devices.

Birds of Passage is out in cinemas across the UK on Friday, May 17th.

Wall

Follow David Hare – recently described as “the premiere political dramatist writing in English” by the Washington Post – as he travels Israel and Palestine in order to assess the impact of the wall separating the two countries on both peoples. The film is mostly in black and white, combining distinctive handcraft with advanced animation tools and 3D motion-capture footage. The outcome is a realistic feel, not dissimilar to rotoscopic animation. The images are raw and bleak with the very occasional splash of colouring – much like the existence of the Palestinians.

Wall never shies away from political indictment. While listening to both sides of the story, it remains unequivocally critical of Israel’s aggressive stance towards the people who could be their “potential best friends” (here I quote Hannah Arendt, who’s not mentioned in the film). Wall reveals that the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled 14 votes to 2 on July 9th 2004 that the wall is contrary to international law. They demand that Israel seizes construction, dismantles what has already been erected and makes reparation for the damage inflicted. Israel opted to ignore the ruling, in a sheer violation of international law.

Comparisons to the Berlin wall are inevitable. The difference is that the Berlin wall kept people locked outside, while the Palestinian wall keeps people locked inside.

Israeli people are becoming increasingly anxious and therefore aggressive towards Palestine, we are told. A recent poll showed that 84% of Israelis are in favour of the wall. It has an extension of 486 miles, in a combination of razor coil, electronic fences, watchtowers, ditches, concrete slabs, control roads and checkpoints. It comes at a price tag of U$4 billion. Israelis use the euphemistic “separation fence” in order to refer to the illegal construction, while Palestinians describe it as the “the racial segregation wall”. An Israeli puts it succinctly: “80% of terrorist attacks against Israeli have been stopped. Am I not meant to be pleased about that?”

Professor Sari Nuseibeh of the Al-Quds University of Jerusalem has the best analogy to describe the relation between controversial wall and Palestinian violence: “if you put someone in a cage they will start screaming like any normal person would. Then you use their temper as a justification for putting them in the cage in the first place. The wall is the perfect crime because it creates the violence it was ostensibly created to prevent”.

Israelis use their own fears and anxieties in order to justify their aggressive behaviour. A man explains it: “Our country feels provisional. In the UK you make plans for trains and airports in 2038. We don’t. We look strong from outside, with army and nuclear weapons. But we feel weak and insecure inside”. Israelis became “addicted to occupation”, like a narcotic. They have become victims of their own anxiety, incapable of distinguishing between real dangers and ghost from the past.

Beauty is also a central topic. “Jerusalem used to be beautiful. Now it isn’t. It used to take your breath away. Now it doesn’t. How could it ? There’s a bloody concrete wall around it”. The Israeli settlements look menacing and soulless. A real eyesore. They sit on top of the hills as if keeping guard over the Palestinians below. The Palestinian city of Nablus has 180,000 inhabitants surrounded by nine Israeli checkpoints, 14 Jewish settlements and 26 settlement outposts (which are illegal even under Israeli law). Nablus used to be the commercial heart of Palestine. Now it’s just “the capital of poverty”.

The final five minutes of this film – when the graffiti sprayed on the titular wall acquires colour and movement – are genuinely breathtaking. Banksy’s iconic Girl with Balloons takes off heading towards the sky. A real explosion of images. A real explosion of feelings. Pure catharsis. A fresh reminder of how liberating art can be, particularly when several media are combined: graffiti, animation and documentary-making.

Wall shows for at the BFI Southbank on Wednesday, February 27th. There will be a director’s Q&A event on theatrical opening on Friday, 1st March at Bertha DocHouse..

Alien

It is hard to decide where to begin. There are just so many reasons why Alien is dirty movie. I say more: it is the most subversive Hollywood movie ever made, alongside Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960). Plus it’s incredibly influential. In 2008, the American Film Institute ranked it as the 7th film of all time in the science fiction genre, while Empire magazine named it the 33rd greatest film of all time. It forever changed the way we see science fiction, women and sex. It spawned seven spin-offs (including the prequels and the crossover with Predator franchise). Yet none of these movies is nearly as powerful and remarkable as the original film.

Alien is based on a story by Ronald Shusett and Dan O’Bannon, who also penned the film script. It follows the crew of spaceship Nostromo, who encounter a deadly, extremely aggressive and resilient extraterrestrial creature set loose on the spacecraft. Six members of the crew are killed one by one in the most horrific and gruesome ways. The cast is stellar (no pun intended). They include Tom Skerritt (Captain Dallas), John Hurt (Executive Officer Kane), Veronica Cartwright (Navigator Lambert), Ian Holm (Science Officer Ash), Yaphet Kotto (Engineer Parker) and the late Harry Dean Stanton (Engineer Brett). The seventh crew member and the only survivor is Warrant Officer Ripley (played by Sigourney Weaver, in a career-defining role).

But why is Alien so dirty? First of all, it changed the way we see women in film. It was the very first Hollywood blockbuster to feature an action heroine in the leading role. Prior to that, women were portrayed as either secondary or vulnerable, reliant on the mighty male in order to make decisions and to achieve their objectives. Feeble creatures prone to cowering. Victims of violence. Victims of gaslighting. Hitherto there were no true heroines in sci-fi and action movies. many film historians and feminists consider Ripley a watershed in the history of filmmaking.

However, Ripley wasn’t your average Hollywood woman. She was masculinised. Her hair was short, she wore trousers, her name was unisex. In fact, her role was originally written for a man. Many people believe that this was a creative choice, and the only way Ridley Scott found to portray an empowered female. Because of this masculinization, both character and actress became Lesbian icons. All of this happened long before the New Queer Cinema movement (of Todd Hayes, Greg Araki and others) was born in the 1990s, with openly homosexual characters.

The final sequence of Alien – when Ripley is alone in the spaceship with the creature and about to go into stasis – has been widely interpreted as a Lesbian act. Ripley appears in her underwear (pictured at the top). The curvy and slimy creature – sensual in a very twisted way – is to be seen in the background. Old-fashioned horror theory states that the monster is always female, the Freudian penis envy being their biggest driving force. The alien creature is indeed female. In David Fincher’s Alien 3 (1992), we find out that the alien had previously impregnated Ripley with her embryo (possibly in this sequence), despite the human being blithely unaware of it. Non-consensual sexual interaction, it seems. Luckily for all of us, the graphic details and the precise nature of this Lesbian impregnation have never been revealed.

There’s more sexual violence and symbolism. The facehugging creature attached to John Hurt’s character Officer Kane represents the male fear of forced penetration (oral rape). And the infamous chestbursters equate to the male fear of giving birth. In the 2002 TV documentary The Alien Saga, Alien screenwriter Dan O’Bannon explained, “I’m going to attack the audience. I’m going to attack them sexually”. Ridley Scott has also discussed the sexual connotations of Alien in various interviews.

Now it’s time you watch Alien again and come up with your own dirty interpretations. Horny, wet and otherworldly fun!

The 40th anniversary 4k restoration of Ridley Scott’s Alien is out in cinemas across the UK on Friday, March 1st.

Brief Story from the Green Planet (Breve Historia del Planeta Verde)

This is an idiosyncratic pop film with bite. Memorable in theme and story, it follows a triumvirate of LGBTQ friends who discover an actual alien inside the house of one of their grandmothers. Sordid story lines make way for long cuts silhouetting the empty countrysides. Tania (Romina Escobar) is a trans woman searching for her place in the world, as alien to her setting as the extra terrestrial is. Opening herself up to a pilgrim, Tania joins her friends as they return the creature to where it was originally found, paying tribute to her dying grandmother.

A journey across Argentinian plains in an intimate car is as alluring as Alfonso Cuarón’s Y Tu Mama Tambien (2001) and although Santiago Loza’s doesn’t match Cuaron’s coming of age masterpiece for quality, it stands decidedly on its own two feet for originality. The film is an eye-opener, foreshadowed at the beginning, Daniela (Paula Grinszpan) waking beneath her eye mask, tellingly pictured by hideously large Bunuelian cartoon eyes. She wakes from sleep to live.

Much of the film is silent and silence looks particularly strong on Pedro (Luis Sodá), a magnetic character unsure of his place in Tania’s journey. The first three minutes are free of dialogue, as we watch these three characters fix themselves for the day ahead. There is a beauty to many of the long shots, whole passages of footage spaced over two minutes detailing the perspective of the vehicle alone. Nicolas Roeg’s untimely passing has brought his influence to mind, this feels like a film that belonged in his wheelhouse.

Then there’s the alien laminating in the darkened room it sleeps in, delivering a strangely comic moment that brings viewers from the surreal to the real and back again. It bases the alien from epigrams of fifties fiction, rather than the muscular machines that have been in the public domain since James Cameron’s time. Friendly, fair and figurative, this alien brings three unlikely heroes on a quest and in doing so, shows them purpose. It’s a film that begs not to be pigeonholed, as many in the arthouse milieu ask to be judged on their visual content. It could be summarised as a Todd Haynes meets Spielberg’s Close Encounters of The Third Kind (1977). If that tickles your fantasies, then this is the film for you.

Brief Story from the Green Planet premiered at the 2019 Berlin Film Festival,where it won the Teddy Award for best LGBTQ-themed feature film.

Madeline’s Madeline

The cat breathes and makes sounds. Little noises that inadvertently get behind your ears and stay with you while you are watching Madeline’s Madeline, the new feature by American director Josephine Decker. By tackling mental illness in the story of a young theatre actress in a manner that disrupts both style and storytelling, the director creates an invigorating audiovisual experience that has wowed cinephiles since its debut at Sundance last year.

Watching Madeline’s Madeline feels like being part of a very intimate dream. We become an integral part of the life of the protagonist, played by Helena Howard in a breathtaking debut. We see the action entirely through her eyes, as she becomes the star of an experimental workshop in a theatre troupe of New York. In the first half of the film she pretends to be a cat and a sea turtle. Next, she pretends to be a pig.

“In all disorder there’s a secure order” says Madeline’s teacher Evangeline (Molly Parker), who is very fond of the adolescent’s creative presence. Suddenly, the play begins to veer in an unexpected direction. The rehearsals are portrayed as improvised, emotional and sometimes chaotic. The same can be said about Madeline’s world. We get a grasp of Madeline’s troubled mental state as she stages her routine through her distorted point-of-view. We also learn that she has a dysfunctional relationship with her mother Regina (Miranda July).

Madeline is not the only one drifting. The visuals do of the movie, too. The camera work and editing include a playful use of the depth of focus, abrupt time jumps and images overlays. These resources handled by cinematographer Ashley Connor and the team of editors (Decker, Harrison Atkins and Elizabeth Rao) go hand-in-hand with our protagonist sense of self. Behind the unconventional and sometimes oneiric narrative, lies an intimate tale about growing up and surrendering to the artistic process. This is not a new theme in Decker’s work, who has placed her very own relationship with director Zefrey Throwell at scrutiny of the camera in their documentary Flames (2017).

Art raises more questions than answers. Madeline sees how her work on the play gets caught in her bond with her mother. Regina is overprotective, and attempt to solve her daughter’s problem with an excessive and damaging mount of nurture.

Howard is the true star of the film thanks. This is an unforgettable role. She walks through the streets of New York at night talking to strangers, while also emulating their mannerisms. This is a committed and surprisingly natural portrayal, and the tactics are both endearing and devastating. By the end of the film, the actress also gives a soliloquy worthy of an award.

The power dynamics between the three women at the helm the story change constantly as Madeline’s Madeline evolves into a more traditional depiction of a troubled mind. Decker’s daring conception of the energetic and fierce Madeline – a complex, lovable and unique character – reminds us of what experimental cinema can achieve. This is truly powerful stuff.

Madeline’s Madeline showed at the International Film Festival Rotterdam, when this piece was originally written. It is out in cinemas across the UK on Friday, May 10th. On Amazon Prime on Friday, July 12th.

Two for Joy

Writer and director Tom Beard has stated that he wanted to write about voiceless British white youth in his debut feature Two For Joy. These adolescents may be invisible in our wider society but they are very much seen in this powerful film of child neglect, sorrow and loss. The film is a portrayal of two families dysfunction during a critical moment when their lives become intertwined.

Aisha (Samantha Morton) is drowning in a sea of depression after the loss of her husband, cared for by her teenage daughter Vi (Emilia Jones) who is also parenting her younger brother Troy (Badger Skelton). This family’s story collides with Lillah’s (Billy Piper) escape from her abusive partner to the caravan park where Aisha and her children have also sought refuge.

The two mothers are played with force and a total lack of vanity by Morton and Piper. Lillah is able to present a veneer of holding things together with make-up and clothes and a pretence at social niceties. Aisha, struggles to get out of bed, wash and dress herself or even provide food for her children. Her hair hangs in lank rats tails, she leaves her phone unanswered and is mostly unaware of her son or daughter’s whereabouts from day to day. Both women leave their offspring to fend for themselves too often and it is this that leads to the darkest chapter of the story.

As wonderful as the two female leads are, this film belongs to the children and it is through their eyes that we see a world that is letting them down. Skelton gives a natural and unaffected performance as a prepubescent teen looking for some anchor in a world that has become chaotic. The association with local ruffian Kyle (Adam Young) is inevitable given Troy’s lack of supervision and the area in which he lives. His lonely demeanour leaves him open to the manipulation domination of Miranda (Bella Ramsey) when they encounter each other at the scruffy seaside caravan park.

Miranda is a wonderful creation from the pen of Beard brought to Iife in vivid technicolour in a focused, committed and terrifying performance by Bella Ramsey. Miranda has a feral and dominating personality with no awareness of risk to herself or others. Her force of will dominates the story from the moment we meet her. She will go to any lengths to keep herself and her new friend amused, leading them on adventures that seem like a desperate attempt to block out what caused the bruises we can see on her back. Lillah tells her brother Lias ( a warm and endearing Daniel May) that Miranda “is a kid she will forget” what has happened. As the viewer follows the children’s journey of petty theft, anti-social behaviour and rule breaking, we can tell that this is very far from true.

The filmmaker Tom Beard employs simple and evocative imagery in order to integrate the themes of the story naturally into the world in which they take place. The cheap illuminated necklace that Miranda wears is both an image of her shining inner light and energy and a beautiful lighting effect when the two friends are lost in the darkness. The concrete, weed infested landscape of Troy’s neighbourhood is a reflection of the chaos at home.

The home-movie quality of the shots depicting a dejected seaside holiday quality to this trip away that is definitely not a vacation. Fish and birds flit in and out of the picture at key points, the cage containing two damaged birds that we glimpse at the beginning, the delicate way that Troy strokes a fish before releasing it back into the river. The animals in this story receive better care than the humans around them. Lias (the caged birds protector) is the only adult who shows any nurturing towards the children, driving them to the fun fair, giving them treats, teaching them how to fish.

As the adults drink cheap wine and eat the fish that has been caught on the fishing trip, we see shots of fish heads and blood in a bucket. As time ticks away everyone assumes that the two younger children are with Vi (Emilia Jones); the scene is set for the dark final act of the film. Vi constantly struggles to make sense and order, encouraging her mother to dress and start the day, complaining that she is left responsible for everything, attempting to study for exams while chases reigns around her. She blocks out reality with headphones, studying French phrases and distancing herself from the cruel behaviour of Miranda.

When tragedy strikes it is in part, because Vi has been left in charge of her brother and his friend.The pressure on her as a young carer is an essential element of the narrative. There are currently an estimated 700,000 young carers (some as young as five years old) in the UK, and their stories are rarely seen on screen. This is an important film in every sense, we need to see more stories that reflect all communities within our society portrayed with sympathy as they are here, rather than paraded as gargoyles of an underclass for the amusement of the intellectual.

Two for Joy is available for digital download from Monday, February 25th. Click here for the iTunes predownload.