The 75th Locarno Film Festival: dark films for dark times

Something happened this Locarno Film Festival that never happened to me at a film festival before. Not only did I see the Golden Leopard winner, but it was actually my favourite film of the festival! Julia Marat’s provocative and fascinating Rule 34 (pictured above) — anchored by a great performance by Sol Miranda as a legal student moonlighting as a camgirl — deservedly received the top honour, which importantly contains a 75,000 CHF prize. Basically on parity with the Euro, it’s probably enough to last you half a year in Switzerland.

But Switzerland, despite the obscene prices, is a very nice place for rich people to retire. So many iconic people move there in the latter stages of their lives. James Joyce died in Zurich in 1941. Tina Turner moved there in 2013. Patricia Highsmith — commemorated in Loving Highsmith (Eva Vitija) in the Panorama Suisse section — literally died directly in Locarno in 1995, while Douglas Sirk is buried in nearby Lugano.

I didn’t hear “The Best” blasting across the Piazza Grande, but in two nice moments of serendipity, my wife sat in our hotel room reading the Ripley novels while I used some free time to check out the Douglas Sirk retrospective. Both novelist and filmmaker have been long gone, but their influence on our present popular culture is unabating.

All That Heaven Allows

And I truly needed some Sirk to counteract the programming at Locarno (covered both by myself and my colleague John Bleasdale), which, although bold and fascinating as usual, veered deeply towards the darker parts of human interaction. Starting with a deepfake exploration of dictators stuck in purgatory thanks to Alexander Sokurov’s competition entry Fairytale, continuing with the war-as-stasis theme in the endlessly repetitive Sermon to the Fish (Hilal Baydarov), and ending with a three-hour tribute to passivity with Tales of the Purple House (Abbas Fahdel), the Concorso Internazionale looked at the present moment and decided there is incredibly little we can do about it, either on a personal level or a political one.

And from the first and second feature competition Concorso Cineasti del presente: the deeply dark tale of Astrakan (David Depesseville, pictured below) — luring one into a simple coming-of-age story before cruelly stealing that childhood away in a triumph of style and beauty in service of narrative ugliness; Arnold is a Model Student, an oddball school satire that doubles up as authoritarian critique; and the suicidal fixations and societal breakdowns of Safe Place (winner of Best Emerging Director in Juraj Lerotić and Best Actor Award in Goran Marković). Some optimism might’ve been found in Before I Change My Mind (Trevor Anderson, pictured bottom)a pleasant enough coming-of-age story — but it was too slight to make a difference. First time directors might want to make their mark with tragic stories, but piling them on top of each other made for a brutal experience. The programming choices were rarely safe, but they could’ve done with some stylistic variation. It asks the key question: why do comedies so rarely play in competition?

Astrakan

I know the world is a dark place right now — war, droughts, inflation, etc — but some optimism wouldn’t go amiss. That’s why I was so happy to see Rule 34, a film that doesn’t just ask questions but actually explored some answers, take the top prize, showing that even in a country such as Brazil, ruled by someone as incompetent and quasi-fascist as Jair Bolsonaro, pushing back is possible.

Meanwhile with Douglas Sirk, we get an unambiguously happy, norm-breaking ending in the form of Take Me To Town (1953) — a peppy comedy-western filled with glorious costumes and brilliant musical numbers — and the complexity of society’s prejudice pushed back against in All That Heaven Allows (1955, pictured up top), an incredible revelation beamed in 35mm.

Sadly, I cannot claim to have “discovered” Douglas Sirk, a director almost everyone in the film industry admires for his savage satire, dynamic use of light, and elegant blocking. All That Heaven Allows, for example, was prefaced by Todd Haynes fully geeking out about his favourite director. Nonetheless, experiencing his films on the big screen has completely transformed my opinion of his work, which I previously admired but never really counted among my top directors. Now its blindingly obvious that his melodramas are some of the finest art committed to screen. It’s just sad that it’s almost a completely lost form, as realism — and almost all of the competition entries were rooted in capturing a sense of “authenticity” — takes over as the most “serious” art form.

Before I Change My Mind

Still, if the films themselves were miserablist, the experience of Locarno remains as enjoyable as ever; whether it’s walking through the quaint, buzzing old town during the day or night, sitting in the dark screen of the Teatro Kursaal, discussing films with like-minded folk, or even enjoying a negroni or two from the Campari Lounge (great choice of sponsor!). And the true magic of a film festival was found in a ramble to Ascona — ducking out of the Pardo Di Domani party, we discovered a bar where the owner Salvatore turns paper into cigarettes and lighter fire into pearl necklaces. Roaring back to full normal life after last year’s light-touch coronavirus controls, these kinds of moments displayed the true value of being physically present at a film festival. Locarno, irregardless of the offerings themselves, is always a pleasure; hopefully next time I can rave a little bit more about what’s actually on show.

Read all of our Locarno Film Festival coverage now.

Tales of the Purple House (Hikayat elbeit elorjowani)

QUICK SNAP: LIVE FROM LOCARNO

During lockdown I tried to learn Russian. It wasn’t a success. My wife tried to make her own bread. It was definitely a success. Abbas Fahdel made an epic three-hour documentary. It’s a mixed success.

Both a video essay depicting painter Nour Ballouk (and Abbas Fahdel’s wife) living during the coronavirus pandemic, and a portrait of Lebanon coming apart at the seams due to the legacy of wars with Isreal, the Syrian refugee crisis, and chronic mismanagement by the government, Tales of the Purple House is both a sweeping, ambitious panorama and an endless series of cutesy YouTube videos.

And just like YouTube’s popularity, a significantly large part of Tales of the Purple House, relies on Nour’s several cats. They chase after mice, scamper after lizards, attack each other and love lounging about. Cats are considered holy, clean animals in Islam, and a metaphor for humanity at large; we are reminded by the owner of a dog shelter that how you treat your animals will determine your fate in the afterlife.

But if the cats in Lebanon are treated well, the people are left behind by constant blackouts, ammunition depots exploding, a depleting currency and skyrocketing inflation. We see protests all across the country, and people getting incredibly frustrated. Everyone except for Nour, who seems to take the closing of borders and the constant presence of death all in her stride.

She is an incredibly passive person, constantly observing and painting the world while it goes on without her input. After all, painting a landscape cannot alter it, neither can filming it. Neither do the many anti-government songs appear to have pushed Lebanese society in the right generation. She even admits at one point, evoking Kirsten Dunst in Melancholia (Lars Von Trier, 2011), that if the world was to end in a week, she would go about almost exactly the same routine.

She is upset with the way the world is, but this frustration never seeps into the movie, which almost seems to accept the status quo and the idea that things will only ever get worse. She is a privileged woman, able to get gas for her car on the black market and never suffers from a blackout. It’s surely one women’s philosophy, almost touching on Buddhist teachings, and it’s interesting to observe, but it gets exasperating and won’t make much impact on the state of things in Lebanon.

The film gets even stranger considering how staged some of the conversations feel — from Nour interacting with her Syrian neighbour, a young boy who likes to kill snakes and help his elders out for free, to her visit to a refugee camp, the likes of which feels rather self-congratulatory. Additionally, Fahdel himself, despite being Nour’s husband and probably experiencing lockdown and the refugee crisis and many other issues along with her, never inserts himself into the movie, making this documentary feel even more artificial.

Neither a fly-on-the-wall slice of observation, or a political polemic, Tales of the Purple House comes across as an arthouse video project that got out of hand and ballooned into 184 minutes. And while there’s nothing wrong with video diaries or movies over three hours, it lacks the kind of internal rhythm or perspective that would make the film sing. Too personal to be universal while too vague to be intimate, it’s a fascinating lockdown project, and a solid capsule of our current era, but it’s unlikely to make an impact outside of hardcore documentarian circles. All in all, a massive lost opportunity.

Tales of the Purple House plays in the Concorso internazionale section of the Locarno Film Festival, running from 3-13th August.