Wood and Water

Director Jonas Bak’s German drama Wood and Water is either blessed or cursed by its stoicism. I say either because this is a particular type of film for a particular cinematic taste. Executed with patience, the director’s observational camera is as interested in the spatial as it is observing its character. The most effective description of Wood and Water may be as an amalgamation of art, story and character, however, its backbone is more plot than it is story.

As one chapter closes, another opens for Anke (Anke Bak), as she begins her retirement. Bak wastes no time in establishing the observational aesthetic that will drive his film, watching from a distance Anke pray, then depart the church where she’s worked as an administrator. She cycles home, the camera watching from its birds eye view as she disappears into the distance, among the rooftops of rural German homes.

Anke is disappointed when her son Max, who is living in Hong Kong is unable to attend a family holiday with his mother, sister and cousin. His absence is excused by the flight restrictions imposed, a response to the pro-democracy protests. The impression, however, is that Max’s absence over the past three years suggests it’s a convenient excuse. Anke travels to Hong Kong to see Max, but finds herself spending time alone, and explores the place that is home to her distant son.

Memories are shared on the family holiday and joint celebration of Anke’s retirement, yet the director chooses not to share an important event with his audience until later in the film. It offers a different context to the nostalgic remembrance of past holidays, and makes the invisible Max who we never meet, more intriguing. Beneath the surface there’s a story left untouched, common in stories such as this, driven by patient observation and spatial aesthetics.

A comparison early on appears to be to Sofia Coppola’s Lost in Translation (2003), about an American actor, played by Bill Murray, confronting an existential crisis in Tokyo. Wood and Water is a more restrained character piece, inclined to offer only a fleeting insight into Anke. Whereas Coppola’s approach was for her character to dominantly reflect our own anxieties and existentialist thoughts, Bak’s approach is to create a hypnotic and meditative space for his audience to enter. It’s about the feelings we project onto Anke, although she echoes that feeling of wandering through space and time, that can be a pleasant or a troubling experience.

Wood and Water never entertains exploring existential themes. The slow and observant pace of Anke’s journey, juxtaposed with the energy of the protests, and their ongoing looming threat, along side Max’s absence, conveys the idea that we reach a point in our lives where the world moves on without us. Bak is not cynical in this expression that his audience can either acknowledge or look past. It’s an idea, and in cinema ideas resonate subjectively. If we’re to acknowledge it, the director offsets it with how we must grow our lives, finding new connections and new purposes in the shadow of fading relationships. It doesn’t mean we must surrender our loved ones, but we must accept that in living our lives, we can grow apart.

Watch Wood and Water for free during the entire month of December only with ArteKino.

On the Rocks

When Laura (Rashida Jones), a young New York wife and mother doubts her husband Dean’s (Marlon Wayans) fidelity, she confides in her larger-than-life playboy father Felix (Bill Murray). Encouraging her to pursue her suspicions, she and her father tail her husband and play amateur sleuth.

Director Sofia Coppola and actor Bill Murray reunite after first working together on Lost in Translation (2003). It’s also a return to the idea of characters reaching a crisis point in their lives, that forges a connection between Murray’s fading movie star in the Park Hyatt, Tokyo, and Jones’s New York writer.

Every story is about connections, if only because characters lives are impacted by the cause and effect of not only their own individual choices, but those of others. Coppola is drawn to the idea of connection and disconnection with a more deliberate intention than just characters arbitrarily impacting one another’s lives. The fading movie star Bob, whose marriage is in crisis, and Jones’s writer struggling with a mental block, is a subtle touch of perhaps unintentional awareness. In stories, whether it be a script or a book, the life of the character is laid out, whereas everyday life is a series of arbitrary, instinctive, even confusing choices.

Both films are about the fragility of connections, that specifically touch on themes of the longevity of marriage and monogamy. In each film Murray’s characters are unfaithful, while Scarlett Johansson and Rashida Jones’s characters both look to their future with uncertainty.

Coppola and Murray reuniting offers a temptation to overlook the connection between On the Rocks and Somewhere (2010). Stephen Dorff’s divorced movie star reconnecting with his daughter Cleo (Elle Fanning), echoes the theme of the longevity of marriage. Felix and Laura’s escapades, during which she questions her father about his infidelities, echoes the nurturing of a father-daughter bond in the earlier film.

The themes of connections and disconnection are not only present as themes and ideas in Coppola’s films, but they give a context to her filmography. On the Rocks is a return to a more energised storytelling, following the restrained energy of The Beguiled’s (2017) emphasis on sexual repression. The energy of the comedy in On the Rock’s connects to the vivacious side of Lost In Translation, when Murray and Johansson go out on the town one night, but contrasts to its contemplative nature. It also contrasts to Somewhere’s slower-paced energy. What we find with Coppola’s latest film is a mix of connection, and not necessarily disconnection, but the contrast in tone of the storytellers voice.

The dynamic of the actors in a comedy determines whether the film lives or it dies. Murray and Jones’s rhythm is impeccable, the glances and gestures complimenting the humorous back and forth dialogue. Coppola shows an understanding of how to temper the comedy. She picks her moments when to transition from eccentricity to absurdity, that does not undermine the serious themes and emotions that lie beneath its playful exterior.

On the Rocks is a film that knows how to have fun, and package up weightier ideas. We may laugh along with Felix and Laura’s escapades, but this is a story that on a deeper level reflects on how the natural desire to be wanted can create a struggle with the journey of a relationship as lust tames. It’s also about how fear provokes disconnection, the need to talk, and to be cautious thinking we know how someone sees us or how they feel. On the Rocks engages with the trials and tribulations of love and human nature to be not only be remembered for the laughter, but for having something truthful to say about imperfect beings daring to love.

On The Rocks is available on Apple TV+ from Friday, October 23rd. It’s also showing in selected cinemas.