The White Crow

his is an unusual title for a film about ballet. “A white crow” is a Russian expression for an outsider, someone who doesn’t quite fit in, an extraordinary person (some sort of antonym of our “black sheep). In fact, no description could be more apt for the subject of this film, Rudolf Nureyev, the greatest male ballet dances since Vaslav Nijinsky. It traces in outline Nureyev’s life from birth on a trans-Siberian train to his famous defection to the West at Paris’s Le Bourget Airport in 1961. The film is inspired by the book It is inspired by the book Rudolf Nureyev: The Life by Julie Kavanagh.

Nureyev could be a monster. The iconic ballet dancer was notorious for his selfishness, egoism, his temper tantrums, always demanding to get his own way even over the most trivial things. In a Russian restaurant in Paris, he doesn’t want pepper sauce on his steak, so he demands that his companion Clara Saint (Adèle Exarchopoulos) tells the waiter about his wishes. He won’t do it because the waiter is a Russian and thinks that Nureyev is a peasant. He demands that a director of the ballet company leaves the room because he thinks that the director and the man beside him are talking about him.

Nureyev was very insecure, worried about his origins in Siberia with its desperate poverty. He gets out of bed as a little boy to watch his mother leaving their dacha in heavy snow, dragging a small sledge after her in order to get essential supplies for the family. He feels abandoned by his stern father in a wood as he goes off hunting. He remembers his father’s hand on his back and compares it to the hands of the forgiving father in Rembrandt’s Prodigal Son, exhibited now in the Hermitage. He is a sinner, an outcast, someone who has not quite come up to standard.

All this probably drove his ferocious ambition, his determination to succeed, his absolute insistence that he would get his own way. This was probably augmented by his homosexuality. It has never been easy to be gay in Russia and it still isn’t. His affair with a German lover Teja Kremke (Louis Hoffmann) is briefly shown. He looks wistfully at men dancing together and flirting with each other in a Paris nightclub and knows that he must go West.

The defection scene in Le Bourget Airport is exciting and tense. He was supposed to have jumped over a barrier to get to the West. In the film he approaches two customs officers at a bar after being briefed by Clara Saint that he must formally ask them for asylum. Clara Saint has been rung up by her friend Pierre Lacotte (Raphaël Personnaz) and told to come to the airport immediately to exploit her connection with André Malraux (it impresses the customs officers) to get Nureyev in touch with those who can get him asylum. After desperate pleading by Soviet officials he walks through the right office door to freedom.

The film does not cover the years after his defection. Clara Saint gets no recognition from Nureyev for her help but then “please” and “thank you” were not part of Nureyev’s vocabulary. The meltingly beautiful Oleg Ivenko gives a very competent performance although his very good looks fail to convey Nureyev’s fierceness. Ralph Fiennes is a very submissive and gentle Pushkin (Nureyev demands that he be his dance tutor), having to put up with his wife Xenia (Chulpan Khamatova) seducing Nureyev. Alexey Morozov is the put-upon Soviet minder in Paris Strizhevsky, who can’t hold Nureyev back.

For all the difficulties of his personality, Nureyev brought much that was beautiful into the world. Those who first saw him dancing in Paris, said that his entries on stage were like “a bomb going off.” Ballet enthusiasts will love this film. It delivers lots of dancing eye-candy, both female and male. Nureyev himself was very beautiful and brought the best out in many beautiful people, including his dance partner Margot Fonteyn. The world is poorer for his passing.

The White Crow is in cinemas across the UK on Friday, March 22nd. On VoD on Monday, August 12th.

Nureyev

Rudolf Nureyev was born in 1938 in the remote and impoverised Russian city of Irkutsk, just north of Mongolia. So poor that people had stripped the trees naked in order to eat the bark. He was raised as the only son with three older sisters in a Tatar Muslim family. He became “The Lord of the Dance” as an adult, and is regarded as the greatest male ballet dancer ever to walk the Earth. Now his journey from abject poverty in an extremely oppressive regime to stardom in the West has become the subject of a documentary.

Rudolf Nureyev was a deeply subversive character. He insisted in dancing despite strong opposition from his father, a Communist party member who thought ballet was “for sissies”. The very existence of ballet had been threatened in the Soviet Union, as the performance dance is often associated with the bourgeoisie. Against all odds, both ballet and Nureyev thrived in the Soviet Union. The Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was far more permissive than his predecessors. He used ballet as a hegemonic and propaganda tool. That’s when Nureyev moved to Saint Petersburg (then Leningrad) and was quickly catapulted to fame. He toured to West in order to showcase the more elegant and affable face of communism.

But in 1961 at the age of just 33, Nureyev defected to the West. This was a huge humiliation for the USSR, and the ultimate gesture of treason. He would not return home to see his mother until shortly before their deaths in the late 1980s (hers to old age and his to Aids-related causes), under the far more lenient and conciliatory Gorbatchev regime. Nureyev did not identify as Russian. His identity was very blurry, as were his language skills. He explains: “I speak badly English, French, Italian, Russian and I have almost forgotten my mother tongue Tatar”.

Nureyev is a fascinating journey through the life a very talented dancer who lived a life full of tribulations and contradictions. The montage is superb: the two directors blend and juxtapose archive footage against a modern ballet act staged on mock ruins in the woods. Nimble moves from the past are contrasted against current-day performances. Airplanes and trains are deftly inserted into these multilayered creations. Soviet aesthetics are used for the intertitles and quotes from WB Yeats, Albert Camus, Picasso, Bob Dylan and Queen Elizabeth II. The film soundtrack also deserves praise, with songs by Leonard Cohen, David Bowie, the Beatles. Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake is a central piece, and we learn that the song is normally used in order to illustrate political debacles and crises.

Footage from an interview with Nureyev on American television is used throughout the film. His extra broad smile combined with his cocky, Camp and vaguely perfidious attitude will captivate you. His naughty eyes are constantly sniggering. And there is also a dash of self-deprecation. Nureyev is magnificent and magnetic to watch, both dancing and talking.

Overall, this is a very well-crafted and enlightening film, even for those (like myself) with a limited knowledge of ballet. It’s entertaining enough even at nearly 110 minutes (a relatively long duration for a documentary). There are virtually no talking heads. The pace is very balanced and visuals are just right. Nureyev, however, does have at least one big problem.

The movie almost entirely avoids the subject of sexuality, and almost seems to suggest that Nureyev was heterosexual and in a relationship with his long-time work partner Margot Fonteyn, the prima ballerina assoluta of the Royal Ballet of Britain. Nureyev, as we all know, was a homossexual. Nureyev sets out to be a political documentary (it investigates the relationship between culture and politics in its very first minutes), but strangely it entirely ignores the fact that sexuality is also a political instrument. And even if Nureyev was evasive about his sexuality, it’s this film’s duty to explore it. Particularly now that Russia has virtually outlawed the (homo)sexual revolution debate by establishing the Kafka-esque “gay propaganda” law.

Strangely, Aids is a central topic. Some sequences are very moving, if not entirely relevant to the movie. We see Lady Di shake hands with 10 HIV patients without wearing gloves in a hospital. And the very last message before the credits roll is that people infected with HIV are not getting adequate treatment in the least developed parts of the globe. Important message, but it doesn’t quite fit into the narrative.The film blames Reagan for Aids crisis because he didn’t even mention the word “Aids” for eight years. Paradoxically, the film seems to have the same attitude the in relation to Nureyev’s sexuality. The word “gay” is only briefly mentioned, and not even in direct connection to the Russian ballet dancer. I don’t understand why the directors failed to join the dots.

Nureyev is out in cinemas across the UK on Tuesday, September 25th.