Saltburn

In the year of 2006, Oxford students shun the awkward and shy University of Oxford student Oliver Quick (Barry Keoghan) because of his perceived lack of upper-class credentials and manners. Popular student and heartthrob Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi) is moved by the underdog, particularly after learning about his father’s history of drug abuse, and his broken upbringing. So he takes the apparently vulnerable boy under his wing, thus devoting his full care and attention. That raises a few eyebrows, with a fellow student warning Felix: “he buys his clothes from Oxfam”. But Felix is determined to make Oliver feel at home. He invites him to his family’s country house, called Saltburn, where he becomes fully immersed in the lavish, exotic, topsy-turvy world of the British upper class.

At Saltburn, Oliver meets Felix’s eccentric family: his stiff upper-lip father Sir James (Richard E. Grant), his sexy and extravagant mother Lady Elspeth (Rosamund Pike) and his equally beautiful and sexually liberated sister (Alison Oliver). Elspeth’s friend Pamela (Carey Mulligan) and Felix’s American cousin Farleigh (Archie Madekwe) are also an integral part of the seemingly endless celebrations. It is summer, and gorgeous weather prevails: “this is probably the hottest day of my life”, begrudges an elegantly-clad Elspeth, seemingly unaware that her heavy attire is contributing to the heat sensation.

Much like in Pier Paolo Pasolini’s Theorem (1968), the visitor wins over the heart of every member of the family. There is a lingering sexual tension. Audiences keep wondering whether this could morph into full-on seduction, as in the Italian film. At times, it seems that it is Oliver’s vulnerability that appeals to the family. Whatever the reason, they are all equally fascinated by the young man. The similarities with the 1960s’ classic do not stop here. They come full circle as Oliver’s real intentions begin to surface. Our protagonist isn’t as fragile and brittle as his nerdish, Mad-magazine face may suggest at first.

Sumptuous and elaborate parties ensue. Sir James wishes to throw a birthday celebration for Oliver with 100 or 200 guests (despite the fact that Oliver has no apparent real friends). Think of a very vanilla Salo, or the 100 Days of Sodom (Pasolini, 1975) with a very British taste. The wealth is vulgar and grotesque, the meals look repulsively garish (perhaps indeed a little faecal), the upper class manners are so heavily affected that the characters feel barely human. The sexuality is ardent and yet unrealised. Everyone looks hungry, raunchy and deeply unhappy. A disorderly order, a fragile equilibrium that Oliver is more than keen to challenge. Even if it all ends in tears. Or blood.

Oliver initiates a very tense sexual encounter with Farleigh, who refuses to abide by the rules that the outsider created. So Oliver convinces the family to evict the only person who has not fallen into his web of lies. This is when it all begins to take a turn for the worse. At one point, Oliver’s deceitful tactics nearly collapse. Felix finds out where his parents live and takes Oliver on a much undesired trip back home, where he finds out that his family are a rather standard middle-class, and there is not a sign of drug use and deeply dysfunctional behaviour. But Oliver manipulation techniques are very advanced. He begs Felix not to share the news with the rest of the family, sparing them the disappointment and confrontation. Our strangely seductive protagonist is prepared to take very extreme measures in order to retain control over every single one of te different members of the bizarre family.

This is a technically accomplished movie, with the finest top-drawer performances, impeccable production design and elegant cinematography, on a par with the British ostentatiousness it sets out to portray. The imagery is plush, the frame ratio is unusually near-square, providing the film with a distinctive cinema experience, a bizarre fantasy drama where the monsters are the lewd and manipulative human beings. On the other hand, Saltburn lacks a clear message. We never know whether it sets out to criticise or to celebrate upper-class values. While Felix’s family are indeed filthy rich and annoyingly clueless, they are the victims, and therefore our allegiance does at least partly lie with them. There is no pleasure in watching the rich eat. But there is no pleasure in eating the rich, either. Ultimately, Fennel is not the hyperpolitical, transgressive Pasolini. While visually enrapturing, Saltburn is not particularly sexy and audacious, either, and the queer element is hardly innovative. All the sexual tension gets diluted in an overambitious narrative, which culminates in a film lasting 127 interminable minutes. Despite taking place in the sultry summer repleted with salacious characters, not for a minute did the hit of the season leave me feeling hot and horny.

Saltburn is in cinemas on Friday, November 17th.

Promising Young Woman

WARNING: THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS

Few films in recent memory have been so hotly anticipated since Promising Young Woman premiered at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival, where it caused quite the sensation, gathering almost overwhelmingly positive reviews. The critics have not stopped fawning over it. It is now a serious contender at the 2021 Oscars.

Carey Mulligan plays Cassie, a young woman whose bestie, Nina Fisher, was brutally raped and ended up committing suicide shortly after. This happened when they were both at college, and as they typically do, the school didn’t do any investigation and the young man who was responsible got off. The relationship of Cassie and Nina is unknown: Cassie has a broken heart necklace; the other half having belonged to Nina. The narrative could work better if they were lovers, but as far you can tell they were simply best friends. Cassie lands in a deep depression and for kicks, she pretends to be drunk at nightclubs and reveals her sobriety to her possible rapist just in time. She gradually plots an elaborate revenge against the man who raped her Nina.

The film fails because its entire narrative is built around “gotcha moment” twists that, besides the final one, are blatantly obvious. The most egregious example is the character Bo Burnham plays, who starts a little romance with Cassie. So maybe “it’s not all men”but guess what, no, he is just like all the others: he watched her friend get raped and did nothing. There is a nauseating scene where Cassie takes an old female friend who didn’t believe her friend was raped and gets her drunk, then hires a man to take her to a room. She wakes up she thinks she has been violated in some fashion. That‘s some disturbing act of revenge, and for a film that purports to be feminist to suggest that traumatising another woman like that, albeit temporarily, is acceptable leaves a bitter taste in the mouth that even its bubblegum coating and cutesy pop song needledrops can’t save.

Carey Mulligan is not bad in the lead, but given how poorly the character is written, you can’t help but wonder what producer Margot Robbie could’ve done with the character. Robbie has a more active screen presence that could have made the clunky beats of the story come more alive, whilst Mulligan is generally more passive in her roles, something she herself has admitted. Laverne Cox also appears as the boss of the coffee shop Cassie works at. Cox is one of the more prominent transgender actresses around, and basically plays the “sassy gay friend” role that became a lame trope in the ’90s, never mind in 2021, but because Cox is African-American and transgender it ticks all the intersectional boxes. The entire film is a cop-out, parading a girlpower message that’s shallower than the Spice Girls (who are on the soundtrack, by the way).

To give the film the benefit of the doubt, you would say it is about grief. However, every positive review has tried to make out that the film is a rape-revenge thriller and a savage critique of “rape culture.” The film is neither one of those, and it all hinges on the final act. In a convoluted way, Cassie “girl bosses” her way through the film, but when she finally has the rapist in her clutches, he turns the tables on her and uses his MyPillow to smother her to death. The final twist is that though she is dead, she is able to alert the authorities with scheduled texts and a delivery of the video evidence of Nina’s rape. But she is dead, and has been burnt to a crisp by this frat bros.

The entire film up to this point has been lecturing you that you can’t trust the authorities to “do the right thing“, but by the end you are asked to put your entire faith in the US judicial system. Anybody with a passing knowledge of the failures of the US judicial system (or UK system, for that matter) and its inability to serve “justice” for victims of sexual violence knows just how foolish a proposition that is – particularly if the murderer has a fairly strong self-defence case. That’s because she carved Nina’s name into his chest with a medical scalpel after tying him to the bed. The ending is so badly handled that is feels like it belongs in a second-class Scooby Doo.

The ending also perpetuates a sexist lie that woman who have been sexually assaulted will have a stain that will follow them their entire life. It takes away any notion that survivors of sexual assault can have any self-determination. Ms. 45 (Abel Ferrara, 1981) is a rape/revenge exploitation film about a mute woman who is raped twice in the same day. It’s a film of catharsis because the woman enacts her revenge in the most effective way: on a rampage of killing men. Even in the final moments of that film, where she is just blowing everybody away, including innocents, your allegiance and your faith lie with the female protagonist. At the end of Promising Young Woman, you just have two women dead, and some frat boys arrested who are hypothetically going to spend some time in jail. All faith is put in the judicial system, making it the perfect film for the neo-liberal elements that co-opted #MeToo, when it’s the system that must be dismantled. Incremental change within that system is not going to bring about justice.

In some corners the film has been called a “female Joker (Todd Phillips, 2019)”. That’s unfair to the movie from two years ago, which has some legitimate class politics and shows some compassion for people with mental health disorders. Even its title is a bad pun on what former Stanford student-athlete and rapist Brock Turner was called by the judge who presided over his case, afterwards giving him a sentence that saw him serve just three months in prison. The pun isn’t actually as clever as it thinks it is, and neither is the film.

Promising Young Woman will be made available to UK viewers on Friday, April 16 when it hits Sky Cinema.