City of God {Cidade de Deus)

A young gang – a slick gun-toting Lothario, a troubled soul caught between his spiritual conscience and his immediate environment, a thief searching for a purpose outside of his role as a sibling – divide their thefts with members of their community. Concerned for the inhabitants of their local favela, the group engage in violent activities in the hope of ensuring greater prosperity for their siblings. What follows is a wry and sharply-written examination of violence in some of the poorer parts of Brazil, where a young and hopefulRocket (Alexandre Rodrigues) must come to terms with the cold, hard realities of life.

The all but wordless opening where Rocket rescues a chicken from being shot by a paramilitary group stands as one of the most innovative first shots in a Brazilian film. The camera flips around the central protagonist, plunging him and the listener back in time, where a simple game of football turns nasty. Partly it’s the restrained camera work (César Charlone depicts the gruelling slaughters in a holistic, quasi-documentary, manner), partly it’s the sense of drama clinging to the character’s chest; ultimately, . And yet it’s also something of a revelation, deepening the relationship between filmmaker and viewer, to make the experience a personal one for all to sink their teeth into.

City of God is almost entirely focused on the soul of man under enormous misfortune, but this is the strongest work of the three, because it spans across a nation’s history, and by doing so, invites audiences to query their positions in life. Furthering the authenticity, directors Meirelles and Kátia Lund cast some inhabitants from the actual City of God favela, which might explain why the movie felt so authentic when it was released in 2002.

More so than Justin Quayle in The Constant Gardener (Fernando Meirellles, 2005), Rocket serves as Meirelles’ eyes and ears, exhibiting the horrors of his environment, regardless of the character’s visceral disgust. In this society the “exception” swiftly becomes “the rule”, as the inhabitants grow more accustomed to the sight of bodies piling on the streets. Rocket is neither a loner nor an outside voice; he’s just one of the people caught in the fire. The more he searches for an escape route, the greater his life is at risk. Like the audience watching the film, Wilson Rodrigues has to ask himself whether it’s worth pursuing his ideals, or ignoring them for personal wealth.

Masterfully directed and at 130 minutes, City of God proved to be a monumental success (the Guardian elected it the fourth greatest foreign movie of all time, in just one of the countless accolades that the movie boasts), largely because it matched the urgency and fast-paced cutting style expected of its contemporary audiences. Better still, the directors push audiences headfirst into the reality, presenting the mania, regret and ecstasy that comes in this line of small crime. The film is neither pro- or anti-gun, as the finished product does anything but deliver you easy answers. But what it offers is something deeply human, conjuring a world where humans watch their ambitions fall as quickly as the bodies shot in the hearts. Rocket inhabits this depiction of Brazil: a country stripped of idealism for drugs, debauchery and gang war. It’s not the story of the small man up against a huge, faceless enemy, but that of a society stripped of its character and sense of community.

The movie presents us with an objective lesson in pragmatism, a world where a retired soldier (played with birdlike elegance by Seu Jorge) can use his skills for maximum profit. The intensity is such that Rocket realises it takes more than courage to make it in the world of crime; “You need ideas”. This is a deliberate consequence of his geography, his generation and his general grasp of reality. Introspection is a luxury only the richest can afford in this corner of Latin America – the majority stand by their weapons. Not only does the film focus on this aspect, it accentuates the landscape to the point where it becomes something of a character in the narrative.

“The City of God was divided,” Wilson notes at one harrowing point during the runtime.”You couldn’t go from one section the other, not even to visit a relative. The cops considered anyone living in the slum a hoodlum”. The world has seen its fair share of division, segregation driven by differences of religion, race and greed. What’s heartbreaking about this work is that the warfare didn’t stem from ideology or identity, but a quest for purging violence, and the gangs don’t discriminate based on race (there are black gang members, as well as white), but the quality of the work. It’s a warfare and sense of destruction that belongs in its own category entirely. Free to shoot whomever and whatever the perpetrator aims at. In adapting Paulo Lins novel, Meirelles and Lund replace the lyricism with a world-weary narration, recorded by an actor who undoubtedly witnessed enough crime to elevate the truth from the words.

Watching it 22 years later, the finished work maintains much of its power, particularly in its depiction of vengeance, which is executed with cucumber cool demeanour. It’s almost impossible not to wince at the child who must choose between his “feet or hands”, after his friends abandon him to the local criminal gang. Everyday existence is simply impossible in this area of the world where crime is the only currency that commands any level of respect.

City of God‘s strong focus on Afro-Brazilian characters and narratives helped to spur a generation of Black talent. Two actors, Douglas Silva and Darlan Cunha, went on to star in the television series City of Men and the eponymous film (Paulo Morelli, 2007), about two young males raised without a father in the favelas. Seu Jorge starred in Marighella (Wagner Moura, 2019), and many other films. Black Brazilian filmmakers are no longer a rare occurrence: recent names include Deo Cardoso of A Bruddah’s Mind and Lazaro Ramos of Executive Order, both from 2021.

The influence of Meirelles’s movie can also be sensed beyond Brazilian borders. It is possible to discern some of the grittiness in Paul Greengrass’s The Bourne Supremacy, made just two years later. There are barely any romantic flourishes, every killing is handled quickly, and with nary a quip to accompany it. Whenever a joke emerges, it’s done in order to highlight the absurdity of the situation. Some speculate that Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire (2009) may have been inspired by City of God. These are just two examples. The universal impact of City of God on cinema is impossible to measure.

City of God is back in cinemas on Friday, February 23rd.

Our verdict of the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam

The 53rd edition of the largest film festival of the Netherlands drew to a close last night, after an intense film marathon of 11 days. In total, more than 400 films were showcased. Last year, the event boasted more than 280,000 visits, and there is little doubt that this audience figure could be exceeded this year (the exact numbers are still being finalised). There were three major competitive strands: the Tiger Competition, the Big Screen Competition and the Tiger Short Competitions, plus countless awards. Other programmes include RTM, Harbour, Limelight, Bright Future, Cinema Regained, and Short & Mid-length. The Art Directions programme is divided into Installation, Immersive Media, and sound//vision, while the Focus programmes feature Rachel Maclean, Scud, Colectivo Los Ingrávidos, Chile in the Heart, and Manetti Bros.

.

Spoilt for choice

I attended the event for five days, and was impressed by the Festival’s ability to attract crowds to the cinema regardless of the film nationality, and the day and the time of the screening. Packed houses are always a heartwarming achievement, particularly on a Monday morning, and for a film made by a little-known director from the other side of the globe. Rotterdam succeeds at attracting film professionals and movie-lovers from across their small nation, Europe and the globe.

As a novice, I did not focus on a specific programme. Instead, I opted to taste a little bit of everything that was up for grabs. In total, we published 30 reviews throughout the duration of the event (including 11 republications from films that we had viewed in other festivals). The film selection is a delicious mixture of award-winning gems (such as Victor Erice’s moody and profound Close Your Eyes, Alice Rohrwacher’s quirky and idiosyncratic Chimera, Bertrand Bonello’s intellectually rigorous The Beast, Jonathan Glazer’s devastating The Zone of Interest, or Ali Asgari and Alireza Khatami’s mesmerising ode to individual and artistic freedom Terrestrial Verses), and brand new, audacious films from every corner of the globe (my personal favourite was Alberto Grazia’s beautifully dissonant and strangely elegant The Rim/La Parra, but a very special mention also goes to Marcelo Gomes’s Portrait of a Certain Orient, Razka Robby Ertanto’s religious Indonesian drama Yohanna, and Fil Ieropoulos’s below-pictured “decolosining” doc Avant-Drag).

.

The awards

The biggest festivals winners (from the two biggest competitive strands) are listed below:

  1. Rei (Japan) by Tanaka Toshihiko wins the Tiger Award 2024;
  2. Kiss Wagon (India) by Midhun Murali wins a Special Jury Award;
  3. Flathead (Australia) by Jaydon Martin wins a Special Jury Award; and
  4. The Old Bachelor (Iran) by Oktay Baraheni wins the VPRO Big Screen Award 2024.

.

You can view our full coverage in. our review archive. The first two images on this article were snapped by Victor Fraga himself.

The top 10 dirty movie-themed slot games of the year

These slots have the poer turn your favourite films into pure gaming fun. In my perusals, I conclude that with these slots embody movie magic meeting the excitement of winning big. Join Nina as we explores the cinematic world on the reels!

.

1. Jurassic Park Slot

At the top of our list is the Jurassic Park slot by Microgaming, rocking a cool 96.67% RTP. This video slot with five reels and 243 paylines is like having the movie on your screen. Bet anywhere from 30p to £15 – pretty flexible, huh? And let me tell you, it’s loaded with about six bonus features, throwing in 12 free spins with a 1-6x multiplier. The max win? Hold on to your hat – a massive 6,333x your stake!

.

2. The Dark Knight Rises Slot

Consider checking out The Dark Knight Rises slot by Playtech. This jackpot slot boasts 5 bonus features on its five reels with 576 paylines. You can bet from 40p to £200 and discover the unlimited free spins with 1-10x multiplier. The slot features special multiplier boosts and these send payouts soaring up to 25,000x.

.

3. Terminator Win & Spin

Terminator Win & Spin, by Inspired, launched on 22.03.2023. With an RTP of 94.5% and above-average volatility, it’s an action-packed slot. Place bets from 0.10 to 100 on five reels with 20 betways. The maximum win obtainable on every spin is x2500.

.

4. Jumanji

Check out NetEnt’s Jumanji slot – it’s like the 1995 film on your screen! You’ve got five reels and 36 paylines for a super thrilling experience. Bet from 10p to £200 and discover 9 bonus features waiting for you. The high-value Lion symbol is the jungle king here. Enjoy five to 10 free spins with a 1x multiplier popping up now and then. With a max win of 504x, an RTP of 96.33%, and some wild but not too wild volatility, Jumanji promises a wild ride with each spin!

.

5. The Goonies

Blueprint Gaming brings you The Goonies, a classic slot based on the 1985 American adventure comedy film. Join seven kids in Astoria, Oregon, on a quest for One-Eyed Willie’s treasure. With five reels, 20 paylines, and medium volatility, this slot’s sure to get you hooked. Released on Oct 24, 2018, you can bet from €0.1 to €20 for a chance to win up to 50000x. The RTP stands at 96%.

.

6. Top Gun

Playtech’s Top Gun slot is like a reel adventure in the wide blue skies. You’ve got aviator glasses, bomber jackets, and even the cool characters like Jester and Goose on the 5 reels with a whopping 243 paylines. Charlie, played by Kelly McGillis, is the big-shot symbol here. Bet as low as 25p or go all-in at £125 for eight free spins with a 1x multiplier. And guess what? There’s a shot at winning up to 1,500x! With an RTP of 94.93% and medium volatility, it’s like your ticket to a sky-high reel journey.

.

7., The Godfather

Introducing The Godfather by Gamesys, a captivating slot game that was released on June 30 2023. Immerse yourself in the story of Don Corleone as you spin the 5 reels and explore the 10 paylines. The family villa backdrop and atmospheric background sounds truly set the stage, for this gangster themed adventure. With an RTP of 93.94% this game offers a taste of the mafia lifestyle.

.

8. Black Widow

Step into the ’80s with Black Widow, an IGT slot that will take you on a thrilling ride. This game revolves around a woman who targets individuals for their inheritance. Spin across five reels. Try your luck on the 20 paylines placing bets ranging from 0.40 to 1.00 in value. Prepare yourself for variance gameplay, two exciting bonus rounds and a maximum payout of up to 2000x your bet! With an RTP of 94% every spin will keep you on the edge of your seat.

.

9. General Maximus

Join General Maximus and other fascinating characters in Playtechs Gladiator slot, where Russell might be MIA but the excitement is still at its peak! With an RTP of 95% and 25 paylines at your disposal you can place bets starting from low as $0.10. Go all out with up to $1250 per spin. The symbols include elements, like the Coliseum, gladiator helmets and beloved movie characters.

.

10. The Mask of Zorro

Experience Playtechs The Mask of Zorro inspired by the thrilling 1998 Martin Capmbell film.

Step into the nightlife of Mexico City with this slot game. Explore its atmosphere encounter characters and unlock a thrilling candle bonus. With 40 paylines and high volatility action there’s plenty of excitement waiting for you.. You have the chance to win big with up to 3000x your bet. Whether you’re a player or a high roller you can spin the reels with a wager of $0.4 or go all in with a maximum bet of $200.

Grey Bees

Serhii (Viktor Zhdanov) and Pashka (Vladimir Yamnenko) are the sole inhabitants of their desolate mining village. The other houses have been looted and abandoned. Their existence is extremely primitive, and the scenario is post-apocalyptic. Their scarce electricity is generated by the little gas that they possess. Their windows have been shattered by consecutive explosions, and the blistering cold January wind enters their house unapologetically. They live the grey zone, an almost entirely deserted buffer area separating government-controlled Ukrainian territory and those occupied by the pro-Russian militia, in the self-proclaimed DPR Donetsk People’s Republic.

The time is January 2022, the month immediately before Russia started the Russo-Ukrainian War. The lives of Serhii and Pashka, however, feel detached from time and space. They feel a deceitful sense of protection in oblivion. Why would Russia want to invade such an impoverished region of the planet? Surely they have more profitable priorities? Despite noting that the two countries have been at loggerheads “for 300 years”, the two men grossly underestimate the futility and the irrationality of the Russian war machine. They forget that Putinism is defined by military belligerence and a deluded sense of moral superiority over the decaying West. Instead, they simply forge ahead with their existences as usual: Serhii as a beekeeper, and Pashka as someone who simply “enjoys” life (even if it’s unclear what kind of enjoyment and pleasure can be derived from this bleak and colourless predicament).

Despite their isolation and complicity (they have been friends since childhood), the two men have some significant political differences. These come full circle during an argument outdoors, hilarious in its pettiness. Pashka has Russian sympathies, while Serhii identifies as Ukrainian. Ultimately, they allow their friendship to prevail above their deadly differences, while also carefully playing cat-and-mouse games with the forces on both sides in order to stay alive. This way, they offer tacit protection to one another, while also vouching for their right to remain in this barely enviable setting. Their silence is their refuge.

A spoon lying precariously on an old-fashioned iron and also on the brim of a mug is a gauge of their vulnerability. If the kitchen utensil visibly shakes, this means that there has been a bomb in the distance. If it collapses, the bomb is very close. They have very limited mobility, and even the most trivial tasks could lead to death (in the hands of the enemy or also through friendly fire). A mysterious corpse appears in the distance, but the prospect of burying it could have serious repercussions. It is with such casualness that they must contend with the presence of death (and the eventuality of their own demise). They seek enjoyment in trivial little moments, but that too proves difficult. Two elusive females – Vitalina and Katka – were once part of their lives, and and now nowhere to be seen. Maybe a little music and dance could bring a little respite? Not without enough gas to power the speakers.

Based on the eponymous novel by Andrey Kurkov, Grey Bees provides viewers with insight into the lives of two worn-out human beings at the twilight of life, and dangerously hanging by a thread to the only existence that they have ever known. This is a quiet statement about the absurdity and the risibility of war. In a way, Pashka and Serhii’s attachment to their land is as incomprehensible and indeed laughable as Putin’s narcissistic self-determination.

On the other hand, the intricacies of the national allegiances aren’t always easy to decipher. It takes some effort to figure out which side our two protagonists support, and why. The differences are too subtle for someone with limited experience of Ukrainian history and politics to grasp.

Grey Bees just premiered at the 53rd edition of the International Film Festival Rotterdam.

Lost in the Night (Perdidos en la Noche)

QUICK AND DIRTY: LIVE FROM ROTTERDAM

Emiliano (Juan Daniel García Treviño) lives a mining town in the Mexican drylands. His mother disappeared three years earlier after protesting against the setting up of a Canadian-owned mining company. The police are lenient at best, perhaps complicit. So Emiliano decides to conduct the investigation and seek justice with his own hands. Our vigilante hero is hellbent on finding his mother’s body. After receiving a revealing tip from a dying cop, he takes up a job with the influential Aldama family, convinced that they have connections to the now fully operational mining organisation, and that their luxurious villa in the middle of nowhere may harbour some very dirty secrets.

The flamboyant family members couldn’t be more different. Television star Carmen (Barbara Mori) lives with her Instagram celebrity daughter Monica (Ester Expósito) and her new man, the unpleasant, faux hawk-donning, self-appointed alpha male and concept artist Rigoberto Duplas (Fernando Bonilla). Both women are equally beautiful, obsessed with looks and fashion. Monica is strangely fascinated by death, repeatedly staging her own suicide in front of her countless social media followers. She lasciviously watches from a distance as Emiliano masturbates with his innocent girlfriend Jazmin (Maria Fernanda Osio). It’s not long before she makes her own advances, instrumentalising her charms and fame in order to win the quiet young man. Her mother plays power games with Rigoberto, and it is these shifting dynamics that arouse her the most (in other words, she gets horny by encouraging abuse). The burning fire of twisted sexuality is everywhere, and it could have devastating consequences.

The landscape is sunny, vast and empty, with a scorching dry soil and very few trees. The sleek mansion, with thick concrete walls, large glass windows and minimalistic furniture, blends in seamlessly with the environment. The outcome is an inescapable scenario. Characters are trapped – both physically and psychologically -, whether they are inside or outside the house. There is little privacy, except for the occasional sun-dappled shade. These people are imprisoned by the gaze of the members of the family, or by the occasional interloper. Rigoberto is particularly concerned that the Aluxes, an exotic religious sect, may tresspass, harass and even attack them. The police also make an occasional appearance, but they seem to enjoy a strong allegiance with the wealthy family. Emiliano is very suspicious of such relation.

With a duration of just over two hours, Lost in the Night succeeds at gripping viewers from beginning to end. There are a few assaults on plausibility, which may disengage some viewers, but do not affect the overall experience. Most of the characters are multidimensional, allowing the director (who also penned the movie script, alongside Martin Escalante and Paulina Mendoza) to easily manipulate viewers, and to insert one unexpected twist after another. On the other hand, some subplots – the religious cult, Emiliano’s redundant sister – fulfil little purpose, and prevent the story from reaching its full potential. Most crucially, the urgent topics of environmental accountability and justice for missing people (two very Mexican issues) become entirely diluted as the filmmaker seeks an brand new direction for his film. The outcome is an effective thriller devoid of a punchy, more profound message.

Amat Escalante first gained international notoriety in 2013 with the crime thriller Heli, and he firmly established himself as one of Mexico’s most promising directors after the raunchy alien horror The Untamed (2016). Lost in the Night is a welcome addition to aa original filmography full of suspense, twisted eroticism and death.

Lost in the Night showed at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.

We Are on Air (Estamos no Ar)

QUICK AND DIRTY: LIVE FROM ROTTERDAM

Vitor (Carloto Cotta) is a 30-something Portuguese gay man in a relationship with a younger Brazilian, whom he’s desperately to please. He dresses up in a police uniform in order to spice up their relationship. Their sexual attraction is very powerful, so much that Vitor watches his loves twerk sensually on his mobile while riding his motorbike (despite the prospect of a horrific accident at any moment). Yet something prevents the romance from fully blossoming. The two men barely communicate, and Vitor never brings his other half home (where he lives with his mother Fatima, played by Sandra Faleiro). Perhaps he isn’t even out to his family.

Similarly to her son, Fatima has a police uniform fetish. She’s head over heels for a new neighbour, who happens to be a real copper and is conveniently on the brink of a divorce. The 50-something woman is very vain and attractive, and she can’t wait to put her brand new tits to use, the byproduct of a recent breast augmentation surgery. She’s a little concerned that she lost sensitivity in the area since the procedure, despite the very questionable cosmetic surgeon insisting that nothing went wrong and that no nerve could have possibly been affected. Ultimately, Fatima is more concerned with satiating her nether areas. She has become wholly desensitised to affection and romance. She’s just plain horny.

The third generation is represented by recently-widowed grandma Julia (Valerie Braddell). Two female friends help her to overcome her loss, generously lending a hand and also other parts of their anatomy – in a plot vaguely evoking Ghost (Jerry Zucker, 1990). It works. The charming elderly lady feels accompanied and satiated – to the despair of Vitor and Fatima, who shudder at the idea that sweet ol’ granny is in somehow in touch with the dead. Ironically, Julia is the most satisfied of the three very different family members. The many decades have taught her a thing or two about romance and pleasure. Her descendants Fatima and Vitor are too concerned with more mundane trivialities.

Diogo Costa Amarante’s first feature film (the 41-year-old filmmaker and scriptwriter had previously made seven short films) blends elements of black comedy with drama in order to deliver a satisfactory piece of filmmaking, with some peculiar insight into the wounds and the fetishes of the Portuguese middle-class. Overall, We Are on Air boasts some very good moments – such as Fatima’s frustrated attempts at seducing her neighbour, and Vitor’s barely erotic and extremely contrived role play -, but it is also dogged by some flaws. There are some cliched symbolisms that add little to the story, such an iron on the vagina (representing burning desire), and a dirty kitchen rat (a proxy for Fatima’s descent into hopelessness and alienation). The film title refers to a television talk show interspersed through the film. All three family members are part of the audience, however they never become actively involved in the programme. Another clumsy symbolism. Still, a sweet debut feature.

We Are on Air just premiered at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.

Natatorium

The decision to put a private natatorium in one’s home basement is a judgment that has only a few likely antecedents. One is eithe a lover of swimming or they are up to something fishy. For the family grandmother Áróra (Elin Petersdottir) in Natatorium, the debut film from the Icelandic director Helena Stefánsdóttir Magneudóttir, the latter is undoubtedly the case.

This is a very wet movie. That’s fitting for Áróra, who seems to have something of a non-sexual fetish for water. Her daughter, Lilja, drowned under somewhat murky circumstances and ever since the household pool has been a catalyst of PTSD and a source of danger. Another one of her kids, Kalli, played sickly and almost ghoulish by Jónas Alfreð Birkisson, won’t last much longer under the auspices of his mother, whose medicinal care includes injecting him with fish tank water. His siblings Vala (Stefania Berndsen) and Magnús (Arnar Dan Kristjánsson) seem to avoid the house (and their mother) as much as possible, though she has yet to be completely ostracised. Magneudóttir reveals information about Áróra at an excruciating piecemeal pace and yet the characters always know, even at their most ignorant points, an easy three times, what the audience is privy to.

Magnús’s daughter Lilja (newcomer Ilmur María Arnardóttir), named after his dead sister, runs off to her grandparents’ home in the city to try out for a part in a play — a weird one in which she dons a skin-tight blue bodysuit with colourful facepaint and ornate accessories. Aspects of her costume might hint at the undine tradition, though I’m not sure that makes sense within the story’s overall themes. Her presence generates a domestic panic between the two healthy siblings, who recognise the danger that comes with their mom’s home. Neither of the able-bodied siblings ever makes use of their full willpower to put an end to the situation, yet they both know (and, in their own ways, respond to) the stakes of Lilja’s stay with Áróra. Their non-response, through thematic content and visual presentation, comes across not simply as negligence but also as mythological lite. In myths, characters don’t do things because they make sense but because providence hangs over their destinies. Things happen because they need to. And that’s one way to interpret Magnús and Vala: as role players in a myth that they do not orchestrate.

There is a softness to the creepy images. It’s as if they caress you before incising into more disturbing terrain and carving a place into your memory along the way. Petersdottir deserves much of the credit here for the way her counterfeit niceness overload moves not into passive-aggressive territory but more of the murderous innkeeper tradition. The audience is never given the choice to trust her — her introduction comes by way of fish water injection. Audiences are let in on information to which Lilja and others remains oblivious..

The cinematography from Kerttu Hakkarainen is always on the move. Often the movement is horizontal, almost as if shrinking the space of the house, where almost the entirety of the film takes place. When the camera stops moving, it’s carefully and almost studious — such as in one conversation in the dining room/kitchen between Magnús, his new girlfriend Írena (Kristín Pétursdóttir), and Vala. The two women sit at the table and Magnús, pacing around the room and eager to leave to get back to work but scared to leave his daughter home, has his face obscured by a party streamer (they are there to celebrate Lilja being selected for the play). Vala tells Írena something Magnús never mentioned about their past and the party decoration visually divides the women from Magnús. The unusually still camera from Hakkarainen encourages careful contemplation. It also inadvertently alludes to the male power dynamics at play in the scene, a somewhat singular scene in a film so dominated by women. Even behind the camera, almost 60% of the crew are women.

Caretaking images, including one sudden segment of a catheter being removed from an unconscious Kalli with his penis in a painful medium close-up, interrupt themselves with life-taking images. Most notably, Áróra, perhaps out of grief for her dead daughter but more likely out of a twisted psychopathic bent, abuses near-death and baptismal-like drowning experiences in order to induce mystical experiences in others. At least, that’s what happens to Kali. Lilja, as far as we are aware, shows no sign of any spiritual encounter… and nor does Áróra herself verbalise an interest in any mystical consequence. In fact, she doesn’t talk that much at all.

Natatorium’s best boons are also its banes. The moving camera feels restless by the end of the picture — not necessarily purposefully so, but it’s grating nonetheless. The music from Jacob Groth is well-written and always engaging, though it occasionally arrives to a scene a bit late. The tardiness occasionally makes the film feel cheap, a slander that the actors then pull the film out of. Most crucially, the ambiguity behind Áróra’s poor parental (and murderous) deeds contradictorily holds together one of the film’s main sources of intrigue as well as leaving more to be desired. She is such a blatantly bad person that she begins to stop resembling a mother of any sort; one wonders how much more effective of a character Áróra could have been had her sins risen from a place of motherhood — twisted motherhood but still motherhood — instead from a place of creepy mystery and ultimately blind ​​iniquity. In other words, Áróra doesn’t make sense in its entirety. And that seems to be on purpose. It works to draw the viewer into Petersdottir’s performance but once one gets closer, they may notice the character is ultimately hollow.

Natatorium just premiered at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.

She Fell to Earth

QUICK AND DIRTY: LIVE FROM ROTTERDAM

Stones are animated and sentient. They contain a human being trapped inside each one of them. They set themselves free upon landing on our planet. And they make a lot of noise. The first 15 minutes or so of this adventure consists of a young woman with a piercing voice screaming from inside one of the tiny celestial bodies heading towards Earth (meteorites roughly the size of an orange). Once outside their unusual cocoons, these creatures assume a normal human size. Our protagonist remains invisible to the majority of human beings, and takes advantage of her “superpower on manifold situations.

She believes that every inanimate object has a different sound. She sets off on a mission to identify them, supported by a sound engineer with a boom microphone to hand. They wish to collect as many of those unique frequencies as possible. They also aim to capture an OM sound (the sound of the universe, according to ancient Asian philosophy). There are also some vague lessons inn physics and astronomy, including constant talk of black holes. This is about as much as I could make out of the barely coherent movie plot.

Susie Au’s sophomore feature just premiered at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam. The director made her first feature Ming Ming nearly 20 years ago (in 2006). She Fell to Earth is not marketed as a children’s film, but it is clearly aimed at a much younger audience. The intonation of the characters (with constant pitch changes), the didactic breaking of the fourth wall, the superficial referencing to physics and superpowers, and the excessive, very basic use of special affects are all common ingredients of the television shows and movies made for our little ones.

The Festival Director Vanja Kaludjercic compared Susie’s work to Michel Gondry, and the parallels are indeed there. Au is a prolific music video director and this clearly shows, with the fast editing and the lack of a straightforward narrative. The touch of surreal and absurd is also there. It’s just the technical wizardry is far less sophisticated. Instead of intricate models, the fast-shrinking humans and advanced CGI effects commonly associated with the French video director and filmmaker, Au opts for simple tricks such as sudden changes in motion speed, shutter speed, successive jump cuts (in order to convey an illusion that people and things disappeared), split screens, spinning drones, etc.

Interestingly, She Fell on Earth provides viewers with a snapshot of Hong Kong’s hidden rooftop slums, a sight most people don’t associate with the highly developed Chinese city and special administrative region. The images are beautiful however a little cosmeticised. Colourful sheets hanging on a washing line and young people prancing down the narrows streets make these impoverished areas look colourful and boisterous.

Otherwise, this is a largely unremarkable movie.

El Águila y el Gusano

QUICK AND DIRTY: LIVE FROM ROTTERDAM

Guita Schyfter’s El Águila y el Gusano deals with heartbreak in this ambitious yet not fully realised feature, and presents the effects of devastation in a number of different ways. There’s a mother who watches her daughter fall for the charms of a man wanted by the police; there’s an art dealer who can do nothing to please his employer, despite his valiant efforts; and then there’s the small matter that Campuzano (Marcelo Alonso) has to choose work over his personal happiness.

The film stitches together a number of disparate stories, most of which involve Calixta (Dolores Heredia, who comes closest to being the film’s main character), a masseuse obsessed with “everything Chinese.” After unwittingly killing one of her patients, she vows to make amends by acting as a role model for her children, but everywhere she goes, she is reminded of her past life. Her situation isn’t helped by the arrival of Señor Bolos, a young man who digs up information about her in the hope of procuring an obscure painting he suspects is in her possession. Campuzano comforts her, and their friendship swiftly turns romantic, but his position as a political/criminal adviser puts their relationship at great risk. Everywhere the audience goes, loneliness follows, but the impact is often lessened by the inevitability of an unwanted punchline or joke of some nature.

Calixta’s comments about Chinese culture (“He promised to take me to Hong Kong..”) are more of a reflection of her character’s ignorance than any racist undertone. The same measure cannot be added to the director’s decision to kill off one of the central characters through “Chinese medicine”, an antiquated trope hat should have been binned in the 1970s. Piers Haggard’s critically-panned The Fiendish Plot of Dr. Fu Manchu (1980) featured a similar sub-plot.

The filmmaker struggles to bring out the best of Heredia, who spends much of the runtime in a sulk of some kind. Only once does Heredia present herself with authority, as the years of heartache finally catch-up with the twice-widowed Calixta, who exhibits her inner torture with solitary tear. Fabiana Perzabal (who portrays Güera, an elegant lady accidentally killed by Calixta at the beginning,) is also underserved by the script, and spends most of her scenes scantily dressed, the camera leering over her body with the glee of a fourteen discovering a model for the first time in his life. Out of the female leads, María Espinoza Stransky has the most refined performance, portraying Clemencia, a head-strong teen who is as repulsed with her mother as she is in need of guidance.

The male characters are better realised, and Alan Alarcón enjoys some of the film’s funniest moments as Bolos, the art dealer with a face almost as forgettable as his name (“Not Bolo; Bolos,” he repeatedly states). And then there’s Alonso, who walks the tightrope between despondency and despair, often within the same frame. Out of all the characters, Campuzano is the one most in need of redemption. He scours the earth, journeying from citadel to jungle in hope of an answer, yet whenever he approaches it, his work (or more pertinently, his engagement to it), pushes him away from pursuing something more meaningful. Alonso is reminiscent of a young Yves Montand: silent, stern, but convinced of his purpose.

Sadly, there’s too much going on for Alonso to develop his character, and what little screen time Campuzano has is often spent in the shadows of the flashier Canundas (Germán Jaramillo, who portrays one of his employers, a dimwitted patron who has more money than sense) and the verbose Calixta. When you consider that the film lasts two and a half hours, it’s genuinely odd to say that the best performance in the film still feels undernourished.

El Águila y el Gusano just premiered at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.

Steppenwolf

Inspired by (and structured through quotes from) the famed German novel of the same name by Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf is, in its plot, essentially a samurai flick with a telegraphed conclusion. The film is set amidst 2022 Kazakh unrest known as Bloody January, though it mostly places itself above the politics, probably for obvious censor related reasons; the political setting in no way is essential to the specifics of the plot, even if the film does a good job capturing the relentless chaotic violence of the mass protests and the police retaliation where 227 people were killed and almost 10,000 people were arrested. A former convict, Brayuk (Berik Aitzhanov), seeks revenge on Taha (the mysterious and goonish big-bad guy who goes without a face for most of the film) for burning his family alive and Tamara (Anna Starchenko), a mute Slavic woman, looks for her missing child. Brayuk seems to believe Taha kidnapped her child — as part of a child organ theft business. Or, more accurately, he uses this as an excuse to mete a violent justice to the both the lawless criminals and useless cops that get in the way. Most of the time, the criminals are at the receiving end of his fists (or whatever non-weapon he uses as a weapon, such as a pair of scissors).

Adilkhan Yerzhanov, one of the most prolific directors in Central Asia, manages to capitalise on the same quirky energy, niche personality types and dorky panache associated with Wes Anderson, while also issuing his own approach over the years. His style is marked by genre iconography, empty landscapes with a peppering of strong colour, and unpleasant violence that almost devests the enjoyment out of the action tradition.

The two make an odd pair. Brayuk sees the world in lens imparted to him by violence of the past; Tamara, by contrast, clings to a hope of a safe future with her child. Starchenko doesn’t have much to work with and that’s not just because the character is mute and in shock. The part reduces her to a passive mother in a man’s world, though the actor does well enough with the part she’s been given. Her Tamara is mono-focused on the rescue of her boy, but her road-trip partner — with a cause as equally emotionally resonate for finding Taha — casually tosses around misogynistic jokes and, in jest, pretends to have a stuffed animal dog perform road-head on him while driving. Brayuk also doesn’t shield Tamara from his violent inclinations and, at least once, hits her.

Religion adds a somewhat puzzling and intriguing aspect to the film, one that helps sustain a vision of hope. Tamara’s introduction comes before an icon of the bloodied Christ on the cross, to which editors Arif Tleuzhanov and Yerzhanov either clumsily or ingeniously analogise with bloodied police shields. Tamara later prays in the face of violence and Brayuk borrows the prayer in something of a moment of private remorse (even though it doesn’t prevent him from further bloodshed). Even the low murmur of a voice she talks with is indistinguishable from a praying voice. Perhaps the most religious moment comes in the film’s final denouement, an act that is more telegraphed than it is foreshadowed through the quotes from Hesse’s novel, as a self-imposed damnation in recognition of what is basically mass murder.

Like Yerzhanov’s most famous film, Yellow Cat (2020), Steppenwolf interrogates the relationship between comedy and violence. I’m not sure there is a conclusive approach through the director’s filmography. Each film tackles the relationship on its own right and, I’d argue, the filmmaker leaves the meat of that relationship to be reflected on by his viewers. In this case, I think it saves the film from propagating the disgusting hero that the action genre has become so prone to. “Good is necessary. Please help. You’re a kind person. Please help,” pleas Tamara to Brayuk just before the film’s final bloodbath. She’s wrong — he’s not a kind person — and no observant viewer would never mistake him for such. His humor and immature won’t allow that.

Intentional or not, the addition of the cockeyed jokester to the determined super-killer turns the character into something unbearable. Tamara can barely mutter syllables after uncovering a supply of child organs, unsure of whether or not her child has been mutilated. Brayuk responds that something is clear, “Someone was heartless today”. In the English translation, the double entendre that makes the joke funny to someone like Brayuk is also what makes it so heartless. What kind of vile person jokes to a mother about her potentially dead child’s organs? And it’s precisely in this humour that Yerzhanov questions the (violent) heroic tradition that staples together the genres he loves so much, especially the samurai film. Not unrelatedly, the action of violence is so often so visceral and crunching that it effectively performs a kenosis of the spectacle. The crushing of an arm by the weight of a car or the de-membering of fingers via an office fan are so perturbing that it forces the viewer to tense or even turn away. The delight of moving bodies is replaced with the mechanical execution of those bodies.

Most interesting is what this says about us as viewers. Have we become so desensitised to cinematic violence — so often presented for its spectacle (kineticism, the dance of action choreography) but without the consequences (blood, broken bones, spewing guts) — that only words can cut so deep?

Steppenwolf has just premiered st the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.

Praia Formosa

QUICK AND DIRTY: LIVE FROM ROTTERDAM

All great storytelling is a journey of sorts, and Praia Formosa – the second part of a proposed trilogy – is no exception. This is a rollercoaster ride into ugly side to Brazil’s history: slavery. The film focuses on Muanza (Lucília Raimundo), trafficked into Rio de Janeiro’s port region, who unwittingly wakes up in the modern day. Through her eyes, the audience sees the development of the African diaspora in Brazil, from servitude to free-wheeling dancers, although the film pulls no punches with its long, lingering shots, leaving viewers to ask how far they’ve come in the last two centuries.

The film starts with a selection of photographs, demonstrating the pier’s width. Beneath the tartar lies the memories of a myriad footsteps, where slaves walked in their droves from the kingdom of Congo. The slaves – much of the time, women – had to abandon their original identity in order to adopt another. In one sobering set piece, director Julia de Simone depicts a line of workers signing away their autonomy for a more uncertain life, their dreams and ambitions jotted down by quill, only to be locked away in a cupboard. The emotions, vast as they are, remain hidden, and Muanza only releases a burst of optimism when she walks by a modern-day motorway, her hips dancing to the sound of African drums pounding away in her ears.

Like Lázaro Ramos’s Executive Order (2020), Praia Formosa explores a side of Latin American history that has been strangely underexplored, but this is the superior effort, and certainly the better realised one because it shows the historiography with sheer raw nerve. But this isn’t a polemical venture, because director Simone clearly loves the region, considering the depths she goes to showcase the beauty of the region. Set almost entirely in Pequena Africa (Little Africa), Praia Formosa doesn’t shy away from the uncomfortable questions, and unlike Ramos’s film, it doesn’t try to outline any solutions to Brazil’s real-life divisions. Instead, it just shows the reality of the situation with as much integrity as it can muster.

Simone wisely chooses to use as little music as possible, and utilises a textured tapestry of sound woven from the natural world. Whether it’s intentionally meditative or not is beside the point; the pace of the film follows the water that funnels through the ports. The rich world-building is the film’s greatest asset: Raimundo looks fantastic, her eyes exhibiting the screams that have lingered inside her body, peering over the hell that has served as her home for the last few years. The character that grows within the space is not the same woman who could have grown up in Africa, but she wakes up in a future that sympathises with this stunted growth, lifting her spirits up with chants and hymns.

This is not an impeccable product. The flaws are few, but they do include a tone deaf confession of love from master to servant, and some of the jump edits are out of step with the film’s more holistic pace. The lo-fi set up is simply too daring to feature a fast-paced cut from one setting to another. On the other hand, The film ends on a pitch-as perfect note.

Praia Formosa just premiered at the 53rd International Film Festival Rotterdam.