The Invisible Man

Conventional stalk-and-slash thrillers make an ally of the darkness. After all, it is in the shadows that monsters hide, and that the imagination, starved of visual stimulus, fills the empty spaces with its own panicky projections. Written and directed by Leigh Whannell (Insidious: Chapter 3, 2013; Upgrade, 2018), and adapted with extreme creative licence from H.G. Wells’s 1897 novel, The Invisible Man certainly involves a lot of stalking and slashing, and certainly many of its scenes are set in the dark – but it is the premise outlined in its title which makes this a rather unconventional slasher. For even when its beleaguered heroine Cecilia Kass (Elisabeth Moss) goes about her business in daytime hours, even when at night she switches on the lights and dispels the darkness, her assailant’s invisibility means that every place in the film becomes increasingly the locus for a paranoia and dread which the viewer fast comes to share with Cecilia (whose very name is etymologically associated with blindness). Here, what you cannot see can hurt you – even in broad daylight.

At the beginning of the film, Cecilia wakes at 3.41am, carefully leaving her husband Adrian Griffin (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) – who shares his surname with Wells’s antihero – asleep in their bed, and executing a methodical plan to sneak out of their beautiful modernist dream home with its clear view of the Pacific Ocean beyond San Francisco. Adrian is charming, handsome, very wealthy, and a celebrated pioneer in the science of optics – and to all appearances, his and Cecilia’s marriage is picture perfect. Yet Adrian is also, Cecilia claims, a narcissistic sociopath, and extremely controlling of his wife – something which not even Cecilia’s sister Alice (Harriet Dyer), who picks her up outside the house, nor Cecilia’s old friend turned SFPD officer James Lanier (Aldis Hodge), who offers her refuge in his home with his teenaged daughter Sydney (Storm Reid), is entirely sure whether to believe.

In other words, Adrian’s insidiously abusive behaviour towards Cecilia is invisible to all even before he feigns suicide and dons the high-tech suit of his own invention which renders his actions more literally invisible. Now able to insinuate himself back into Cecilia’s life unnoticed by anybody – except Cecilia – he sets about terrorising and victimising her all over again, knowing that nobody will ever believe her crazy accusations against a dead man who, well, clearly isn’t there. While this makes for astonishingly tense and creepy cat and mouse, all brilliantly handled by Whannell to exploit our constant sense, in any and every scene, of a possible presence that we simply cannot see, and superbly embodied in Moss’ depiction of escalating incredulity, resigned despair and calculated defiance, it also serves as a compelling allegory for the kind of bullying and gaslighting that occur in toxic relationships, where victims are constantly expected to keep quiet, or if they do not, are so often simply not credited with telling the truth.

Indeed so twisty is the film’s narrative structure, and so blinkered the perspectives that we are invited to share on what is happening beyond the film’s visible spectrum, that we too at times are made to question Cecilia’s sanity and to entertain the suspicion that she might after all be merely inventing her nemesis as her own personality fractures. No one will listen to Cecilia, and everyone thinks she is suffering a mental breakdown – until she either is left with “no choice” but to learn to live with her persecutor’s domineering aggression (like the protagonist of Sidney J. Furie’s in many ways similar The Entity, 1982), or else start to turn the tables on her oppressor and take back some control (in the process perhaps becoming a monster herself).

Paul Verhoeven’s The Hollow Man (2000) introduced us to a science prodigy, who is also an alpha-male ‘maverick’ – the kind of figure who is typically the hero and point of identification in a Hollywood film – and then, as it followed his experiments in invisibility and the stripping away of his moral compunctions, asked us, step by step, how comfortable we still felt following this all-American winner on his eventually rape-happy, murderous descent. In Whannell’s film, Adrian is just as vindictive and even more devious, but the focus here is far less on the unseen antagonist than on the victim with whom he is messing, even as similar questions are gradually raised about the degree to which we find Cecilia’s responses to her impossible situation to be acceptable. For ultimately The Invisible Man is a variant – with sci-fi underpinnings – of the rape-revenge film, and enters all the moral grey areas associated with that subgenre.

Much as Adrian manipulates Cecilia and others, The Invisible Man manipulates the viewer, panning to, or just lingering on, the negative spaces in its locations to generate maximum unease from what would normally just be inconspicuous background, and to suggest a presence to all the absence. Coming with shades of Jaume Balagueró’s Sleep Tight (2011), Steven

Soderbergh’s Unsane (2018) and Justin Edgar’s Stalked (2019), Whannell’s film confidently updates the source material not just in terms of its science, but also in terms of its gender politics, repurposing the barebones of Wells’s premise as a potent metaphor for what we so often fail or even refuse to see in the power relationships between men and women.

The Invisible Man is in cinemas across the UK on Friday, February 28th. On VoD in June.

The Square

Scandinavian humour isn’t very easy to grasp, particularly if you come from a Latin culture (like myself), more used to explicit and on-your-face jest glazed with sexual innuendo. The director of the acclaimed Force Majeure (2015) returns with a strange blend of comedy and suspense, dotted with social commentary. The social and corporate jokes are reminiscent of Lars von Trier’s The Boss of it all (2006). Much of the humour in The Square is build upon awkwardness, and how Scandinavians are uncomfortable with confrontation.

Christian (Claes Bang) is the very square and respectable curator of a contemporary art museum, and the divorced father of two girls. Their upcoming art installation is entitled The Square, and it invites passersby to leave their belongings and trust their fellow beings. Christian has a dalliance with Anna (Elisabeth Moss), an American living with a pet chimpanzee about twice her size. The equilibrium in Christian’s life is disrupted when his mobile phone is stolen, thereby shattering his very own notions of solidarity and altruism. Such a small mishap triggers some very extreme reactions from a man otherwise calm and balanced.

The Scandinavian obsession with freedom of speech (the same one that led to the persecution of Danish cartoonist Jyllands-Posten) is central to the film, and it creates some of the most hilarious moments. During a television show, a member of the audience who suffers from Tourette’s can’t stop screaming the most shocking profanities to Christian and the female presenter: “cock”, “show your tits” and “cameltoe”. Yet no one will stop the man. Later in the movie, a performer is hired to act as a wild beast during a dinner (pictured at the top), and it takes a very long time before anyone attempts to stop him. Foucault would be proud indeed, body and soul.

The wild beast sequence is probably the most important one in the movie, and it reminded me a lot of people “spassing” (ie pretending to have serious mental problems) in The Idiots (once again by Lars Von Trier, 1998). Both the Danish and the Swedish director successfully experiment with the limits of humour and sanity. In both cases the people embrace the character so thoroughly that they seem to lose the connections with their own selves.

The film, however, has a few shortcomings. Firstly, it’s extremely long at 145 minutes. Second, The Square is a cubist movie which doesn’t manage to gel the fragments together in a intelligible way. It’s a painting the perfectionist Picasso would not show in an art exhibition. Overall, it lacks cohesion. Christian’s family life is never fully explored, not is his relation to Anna. Despite the long duration, a lot of narrative strains are left up in the air, and the film feels a little tedious at times.

Plus there is an extremely unnerving version of Schubert’s Ave Maria with a “doo doo dah” scatting in the background played ad infinitum in the movie. Not funny at all!

The Square showed as part of the 70th Cannes International Film Festival, when this piece was originally written. It won the Palme d’Or. It’s out in UK cinemas on Friday, March 16th.